Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 45517/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16035) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRIVOSEJS v. LATVIA
Art. 3 MRK
No violation of Art. 3 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Krivosejs v. Latvia
Wird zitiert von ... (3)
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 19437/05
ANTONOVS v. LATVIA
The Court notes that in some cases against Latvia it has been able to scrutinise monitoring activity undertaken by the MADEKKI as regards the quality of medical care in prison (see Daģis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 7843/02, 20 June 2009; Krivosejs v. Latvia, no. 45517/04, 17 January 2012; Van Deilena v. Latvia (dec.), no. 50950/06, 15 May 2012; and Leitendorfs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 35161/03, 3 July 2012). - EGMR, 25.02.2014 - 25147/07
BERZINS v. LATVIA
To assess this evidence, the Court adopts the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" but adds that such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Krivosejs v. Latvia, no. 45517/04, § 69, 17 January 2012, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 35161/03
LEITENDORFS v. LATVIA
The adequacy of the medical assistance is examined by taking into account various elements, such as, inter alia, timely diagnostics and treatment (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-06, 28 March 2006); and, where necessary, regular and systematic supervision aimed at preventing the aggravation of the prisoner's health condition (see Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006, and, more recently, Krivosejs v. Latvia, no. 45517/04, § 71, 17 January 2012).