Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LEVINTA v. MOLDOVA (No. 2)

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 No violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Levinta v. Moldova

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 5140/02

  FEDOTOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 50717/09

  The Court must also be satisfied that any detention during the period under consideration was compatible with the purpose of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which is to prevent people from being deprived of their liberty in an arbitrary fashion (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 154, ECHR 2002-IV, and Fedotov v. Russia, no. 5140/02, § 74, 25 October 2005).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 50717/09

  The Court recalls that, under the second limb of Article 5 § 3, a person charged with an offence must always be released pending trial unless the State can show that there are "relevant and sufficient" reasons to justify his continuing detention (YaÄŸcı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 52, Series A no. 319-A).

• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 25664/09

  DANALACHI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The Court must also be satisfied that any detention during the period under consideration was compatible with the purpose of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which is to prevent people from being deprived of their liberty in an arbitrary fashion (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 154, ECHR 2002-IV; Fedotov v. Russia, no. 5140/02, § 74, 25 October 2005; and Levinta v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 50717/09, § 29, 17 January 2012).