Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  X v. \

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  X v. \

  [MAC] Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  X v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2019 - 29683/16

  Where a particularly important facet of an individual's existence or identity is at stake, the margin allowed to the State will be restricted (see, for example, X and Y v. the Netherlands, cited above, §§ 24 and 27, and Christine Goodwin, cited above, § 90; see also Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 71, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 03.09.2015 - 10161/13

  M. AND M. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2019 - 29683/16

  The excessive length of the domestic proceedings may constitute a special circumstance which would absolve the applicants from exhausting the domestic remedies at their disposal (see M. and M. v. Croatia, no. 10161/13, § 174, ECHR 2015 (extracts), and ? orgic v. Serbia, no. 34973/06, § 55, 3 November 2011).

• EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 76888/17

  Drittes Geschlecht in Frankreich: "Intersexuell" muss nicht in die Geburtsurkunde

  Elle rappelle à cet égard, mutatis mutandis, qu'elle a procédé ainsi dans plusieurs affaires relatives à l'identité de genre de personnes transgenres (voir X et Y c. Roumanie, précité, § 145, Y.T. c. Bulgarie, précité, § 61, X c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 29683/16, § 65, 17 janvier 2019, S.V. c. Italie, no 55216/08, § 60, 11 octobre 2018, A.P., Garçon et Nicot, précité, § 99, Hämäläinen, précité, § 64, Christine Goodwin, précité, § 71, et Sheffield et Horsham c. Royaume-Uni, 30 juillet 1998, § 51, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1998-V).
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 2145/16

  X ET Y c. ROUMANIE

  DROIT ET PRATIQUE INTERNATIONAUX Dans le cadre du Conseil de l'Europe 79. Les textes pertinents figurent dans les arrêts A.P., Garçon et Nicot c. France (précité, §§ 73-77) et X c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine (no 29683/16, §§ 31-33, 17 janvier 2019).

  Cela concerne tous les individus, y compris les personnes transgenres, comme les requérants, qu'elles souhaitent ou non commencer un traitement de conversion sexuelle agréé par les autorités (A.P., Garçon et Nicot, §§ 92-94, précité, et X c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 29683/16, § 38, 17 janvier 2019).

• EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 40888/17

  RANA v. HUNGARY

  An overview of relevant international materials is outlined in X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 29683/16, §§ 31-34, 17 January 2019.

  Therefore, the Court considers that the applicant's complaint falls to be examined from the standpoint of whether or not the respondent State has failed to comply with the positive obligation to secure the applicant's right to respect for his private life, in particular by not providing him with a procedure allowing him to have his gender identity legally recognised in the absence of a Hungarian birth certificate (see, mutatis mutandis, X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 29683/16, §§ 63-65, 17 January 2019, and L. v. Lithuania, no. 27527/03, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2007-IV).

 
• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 66078/17

  Á.CS. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 8 on the grounds that the lack of a clear legal framework for gender recognition were at odds with the States' positive obligation to provide quick, transparent and accessible procedures for legal gender recognition (see, among others, Y.T. v. Bulgaria, no. 41701/16, 9 July 2020; A.D. and Others v. Georgia, nos. 57864/17 and 2 others, 1 December 2022; and X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 29683/16, 17 January 2019).
• EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 74131/14

  Y v. POLAND

  In the present case, the Court notes that the applicant did not specifically complain about the lack of a regulatory framework for legal gender recognition in Poland (compare, for example, X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 29683/16, 17 January 2019, and Y.T. v. Bulgaria, no. 41701/16, 9 July 2020).
• EGMR, 09.07.2020 - 41701/16

  Y.T. c. BULGARIE

  Cela concerne tous les individus, y compris les personnes transgenres, comme le requérant, qu'elles souhaitent ou non commencer un traitement de réassignation sexuelle agréé par les autorités (A.P., Garçon et Nicot c. France, nos 79885/12 et 2 autres, §§ 92-94, 6 avril 2017 (extraits), et X c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 29683/16, § 38, 17 janvier 2019).