Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.02.2011 - 46745/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,53925) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SOURLAS v. GREECE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.05.2002 - 28856/95
JOKELA v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2011 - 46745/07
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable judicial and administrative procedures (see Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 47148/99
NOVOSSELETSKI c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2011 - 46745/07
The Court maintains on this point that, in the absence of any obligation for a judicial authority to give reasons for their decisions, the rights guaranteed by the Convention would be illusory and theoretical (see Novoseletskiy v. Ukraine, no. 47148/99, § 111, ECHR 2005 II (extracts), and Bistrovic, cited above, § 37). - EGMR, 27.03.2007 - 45628/99
APOSTOLIDI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2011 - 46745/07
The Court is also called upon to examine the quality of the law in question, namely, the existence of rules that are accessible, precise and foreseeable in their application (see, among many other authorities, Apostolidi and Others v. Turkey, no. 45628/99, § 70, 27 March 2007). - EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 43588/06
VONTAS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2011 - 46745/07
The Court further reiterates that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 implies that any interference with the peaceful enjoyment of possessions must be accompanied by procedures affording to the individual or entity concerned a reasonable opportunity of presenting their case to the relevant authorities for the purpose of effectively challenging the measures interfering with the rights guaranteed by this provision (see Vontas and Others v. Greece, no. 43588/06, § 36, 5 February 2009). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30985/96
HASSAN ET TCHAOUCH c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2011 - 46745/07
The requirement of lawfulness, within the meaning of the Convention, presupposes, among other things, that domestic law must provide a measure of legal protection against arbitrary interferences by the public authorities with the rights safeguarded by the Convention (see Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI).