Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ADORISIO AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ADORISIO AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS and 2 other applications

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 47315/13
• EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13, 48490/13, 49016/13

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  It is apparent from the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) [i.e. the Court] (e.g. the case of Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom [Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93]) that article 6 ECHR does not confer an absolute right of access to the courts.

  Referring to Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93; Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, ECHR 2000-II; Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, no. 39482/98, ECHR 2003-VII; A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, ECHR 2009; and Druzstevní zálozna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 72034/01, 31 July 2008, the Government submitted that the Court should respect the margin of appreciation of Contracting States in the matter of limiting the right of access to documents in the public interest: such limitation should be accepted provided that the right of access to the courts was not impaired in its very essence, the limitations served a legitimate aim and the requirement of proportionality was met.

• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  Thus, although these provisions have a certain relevance outside the strict confines of criminal law, the Contracting States have greater latitude when dealing with civil cases concerning civil rights and obligations than they have when dealing with criminal cases (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 32, Series A no. 274).
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 24846/94

  ZIELINSKI ET PRADAL & GONZALEZ ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, § 57, ECHR 1999-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 126, ECHR 2006-V; and Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos.

 
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  The Court has held that while in principle the legislature is not precluded in civil matters from adopting new retrospective provisions to regulate rights arising under existing laws, the principle of the rule of law and the notion of fair trial enshrined in Article 6 preclude any interference by the legislature - other than on compelling grounds of the general interest - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 49, Series A no. 301-B; Papageorgiou v. Greece, 22 October 1997, § 37, Reports 1997-VI; National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 112, Reports 1997-VII; Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-III; Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  The Court has held that while in principle the legislature is not precluded in civil matters from adopting new retrospective provisions to regulate rights arising under existing laws, the principle of the rule of law and the notion of fair trial enshrined in Article 6 preclude any interference by the legislature - other than on compelling grounds of the general interest - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 49, Series A no. 301-B; Papageorgiou v. Greece, 22 October 1997, § 37, Reports 1997-VI; National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 112, Reports 1997-VII; Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-III; Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95

  ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  Referring to Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93; Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, ECHR 2000-II; Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, no. 39482/98, ECHR 2003-VII; A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, ECHR 2009; and Druzstevní zálozna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 72034/01, 31 July 2008, the Government submitted that the Court should respect the margin of appreciation of Contracting States in the matter of limiting the right of access to documents in the public interest: such limitation should be accepted provided that the right of access to the courts was not impaired in its very essence, the limitations served a legitimate aim and the requirement of proportionality was met.
• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  The Government drew attention to Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, in which the Court had held a requirement that shareholders in industries subject to nationalisation collectively appoint a representative to defend their interests to fall within the margin of appreciation of the respondent Contracting State.
• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 39482/98

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (rechtliches Gehör; Waffengleichheit; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  Referring to Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93; Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, ECHR 2000-II; Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, no. 39482/98, ECHR 2003-VII; A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, ECHR 2009; and Druzstevní zálozna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 72034/01, 31 July 2008, the Government submitted that the Court should respect the margin of appreciation of Contracting States in the matter of limiting the right of access to documents in the public interest: such limitation should be accepted provided that the right of access to the courts was not impaired in its very essence, the limitations served a legitimate aim and the requirement of proportionality was met.
• EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 34940/10

  GRAINGER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  Referring to Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts), and Grainger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34940/10, 10 July 2012, the Government submitted that the Court had recognised the appropriateness of leaving Contracting States a wide margin of appreciation in such matters.
• EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 49429/99

  CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 47315/13

  Referring to Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts), and Grainger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34940/10, 10 July 2012, the Government submitted that the Court had recognised the appropriateness of leaving Contracting States a wide margin of appreciation in such matters.
• EGMR, 19.06.2013 - 72034/01

  DRUZSTEVNÍ ZÁLOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS AND ANOTHER CASE AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EuG, 26.03.2014 - T-321/13

  Adorisio u.a. / Kommission

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 10.03.2022 - C-7/21

  LKW WALTER - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und …

  Trotz des Wortlauts, der lediglich auf eine Verbindung zum Strafverfahren hindeutet, ist diese Vorschrift vom Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte auch auf das Verwaltungs- und Zivilverfahren angewandt worden (vgl. EGMR, 17. März 2015, Adorisio u. a./Niederlande, CE:ECHR:2015:0317DEC004731513, betreffend eine kurze Rechtsmittelfrist).