Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HORYCH v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) ...

Besprechungen u.ä.

• skmr.ch (Kurzaufsatz mit Bezug zur Entscheidung)

  Die Einzelhaft als Herausforderung für den Freiheitsentzug

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08
• EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 13621/08
• EGMR - 13621/08 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 18.01.2017 - 41576/98

  GANCI ET 12 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE L'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  These arrangements, intended to prevent the risk of escape, attack or disturbance of the prison community, are based on separation of such detainees from the prison community together with tighter controls (see, for instance, Ramirez Sanchez, cited above, §§ 80-82 and 138; Messina (no. 2) v. Italy, no. 25498/94, ECHR 2000-X, §§ 42-54; Labita, cited above, §§ 103-109; Rohde v. Denmark, no. 69332/01, 21 July 2005, § 78; Van der Ven, cited above, §§ 26-31 and 50; and Csüllög v. Hungary, no. 30042/08, 7 June 2011, §§ 13-16).

  Indeed, solitary confinement, which is a form of "imprisonment within the prison", should be resorted to only exceptionally and after every precaution has been taken, as specified in paragraph 53.1 of the European Prison Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 January 2006 (see Öcalan, cited above, § 191; Ramirez Sanchez, cited above, §§ 139 and 145-146; Messina (no.2) v. Italy (dec), no. 25498/94, ECHR 1999-V, with further references; and Csüllög v. Hungary, cited above, § 31).

• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 50901/99

  VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or to debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a violation of Article 3 (see Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, ECHR 2003-II, § 48).
• EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 44362/04

  DICKSON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  (see, muatis mutandis, Hirst (no. 2) v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005-IX, § 69; and Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, ECHR 2007-..., §§ 67-68).

 
• EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 30042/08

  CSÜLLÖG v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  These arrangements, intended to prevent the risk of escape, attack or disturbance of the prison community, are based on separation of such detainees from the prison community together with tighter controls (see, for instance, Ramirez Sanchez, cited above, §§ 80-82 and 138; Messina (no. 2) v. Italy, no. 25498/94, ECHR 2000-X, §§ 42-54; Labita, cited above, §§ 103-109; Rohde v. Denmark, no. 69332/01, 21 July 2005, § 78; Van der Ven, cited above, §§ 26-31 and 50; and Csüllög v. Hungary, no. 30042/08, 7 June 2011, §§ 13-16).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  The nature of the offence allegedly committed by the applicant is therefore irrelevant for the purposes of Article 3 (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 30, 18 October 2001; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, ECHR 2005-..., § 179; and Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, ECHR-2006-..., § 115 et seq., with further references).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  Ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX, § 91).
• EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 31143/96

  INDELICATO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  The nature of the offence allegedly committed by the applicant is therefore irrelevant for the purposes of Article 3 (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 30, 18 October 2001; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, ECHR 2005-..., § 179; and Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, ECHR-2006-..., § 115 et seq., with further references).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 13621/08

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial and enforcement proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland, no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V, and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII, and in its the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.

• EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 62395/12

  DEJNEK v. POLAND

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of "dangerous detainee" regime are set out in the Court's judgments in the cases of Piechowicz v. Poland (no. 20071/07, §§ 105-117, 17 April 2012), and Horych v. Poland (no. 13621/08, §§ 44-56, 17 April 2012).
• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 37648/02

  PAOLELLO c. ITALIE

  Pour qu'une peine et le traitement dont elle s'accompagne puissent être qualifiés d"« inhumains'ou de « dégradants ", la souffrance ou l'humiliation doivent en tout cas aller au-delà de celles que comporte inévitablement une forme donnée de traitement ou de peine légitimes (Jalloh c. Allemagne [GC], no 54810/00, § 68, CEDH 2006-IX ; Enea c. Italie [GC], no74912/01, 17 septembre 2009, § 56 ; Piechowicz c. Pologne, no 20071/07, 17 avril 2012, § 159 ; Horych c. Pologne, no 13621/08, 17 avril 2012, § 86).
• EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 12120/11

  KWIEK v. POLAND

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the monitoring of "dangerous detainees" and personal check are set out in the Court's judgments in the cases of Piechowicz v. Poland (no. 20071/07, §§ 110-117, 17 April 2012), and Horych v. Poland (no. 13621/08, §§ 49-56, 17 April 2012).