Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAMELKA v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 40679/98

  DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 16761/07

  The Court reiterates that, according to its established case-law, the purpose of the domestic remedies rule in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Dankevich v. Ukraine, no. 40679/98, § 107, 29 April 2003).
• EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91

  QUINN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 16761/07

  The Court must, therefore, scrutinise complaints of delays in release of detainees with particular vigilance (see Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, § 42, Series A no. 311; Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, § 25, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; K.-F. v. Germany, 27 November 1997, §§ 70, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000-IV; and Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 80, 30 January 2003).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 16761/07

  The words "in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law" essentially refer to domestic law and lay down an obligation to comply with its substantive and procedural provisions, but also require that any measure depriving the individual of his liberty must be compatible with the purpose of Article 5, namely to protect the individual from arbitrariness (see Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no. 33; and Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II).

• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 35413/07

  KARPOVA v. RUSSIA

  The Court is particularly concerned about the fact that the Russian Code on the Execution of Sentences allowed the authorities to delay the implementation of the release order for any duration of time pending receipt of a certified copy (compare Wereda v. Poland, no. 54727/08, §§ 43-44, 26 November 2013, and Mamelka v. Poland, no. 16761/07, § 34, 17 April 2012).