Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2012,15919
EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,15919)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.04.2012 - 31805/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,15919)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. April 2012 - 31805/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,15919)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15919) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    RIZVANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Art. 3 MRK
    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (24)  

  • EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 47274/15

    Konflikt zwischen Polizei und Fans ungenügend untersucht

    Der Gerichtshof erinnert daran, dass insoweit eine prompte forensische Untersuchung entscheidend ist, da Anzeichen für Verletzungen häufig recht schnell verschwinden und bestimmte Verletzungen innerhalb von Wochen oder sogar wenigen Tagen heilen können (siehe Rizvanov./. Aserbaidschan, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 31805/06, Rdnrn. 46 und 47, 17. April 2012).
  • EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 60659/08

    KHALIL v. AZERBAIJAN

    Having regard to the Court's position with respect to affording just satisfaction to the injured party in similar cases (see, inter alia, Najafli v. Azerbaijan, Application no. 2594/07, Judgment of 2 October 2012; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, Application no. 31805/06, Judgment of 17 April 2012), the Government are ready to pay to the applicant a total sum of EUR 25, 000 (twenty-five thousand euros), including EUR 3, 000 (three thousand euros) as the compensation for costs and expenses, plus any tax may be chargeable on this amount.

    The Court further observes that there is already well-established case-law of the Court, including regarding Azerbaijan, concerning the main complaints raised by the applicant in his applications (see, for instance, Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, §§ 49-88, 7 May 2015; Uzeyir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 54204/08, §§ 37-72, 29 January 2015; Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, §§ 30-70, 2 October 2012; and Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 32-61, 17 April 2012).

  • EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07

    LENEV v. BULGARIA

    It has also explained that prompt forensic examination is crucial as signs of injury may often disappear quickly and certain injuries may heal within weeks or even a few days (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 47, 17 April 2012).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 2594/07

    NAJAFLI v. AZERBAIJAN

    The Court notes that the applicant lodged a civil claim complaining, inter alia, of a violation of his rights under Article 10 of the Convention (see § 22 above and, a contrario, Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 73, 17 April 2012).
  • EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11

    MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Moreover, unlike the cases in which the applicants were able to produce a contract for legal services, according to which, the amounts due were to be paid in the event that the Court found a violation of the applicants" rights (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, §§ 72-75, 3 February 2011, and Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 85-89, 17 April 2012), in the present case no such a contract was submitted to the Court.
  • EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 38906/07

    KARABET AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Apparently, only a visual examination took place, without any serious attempt to establish all the injuries and determine their cause using forensic methods (see, mutatis mutandis, Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 47, 17 April 2012).
  • EGMR - 11133/11 (anhängig)

    PYNKO v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications

    (b) was the recourse to physical force made strictly necessary by the applicants" own conduct (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 49, 17 April 2012)? In particular,.
  • EGMR, 28.04.2016 - 8347/07

    BALAJEVS v. LATVIA

    Therefore, the Court cannot but conclude that the use of force was unnecessary and excessive (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 50, 17 April 2012).
  • EGMR, 04.02.2016 - 81553/12

    HILAL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    The Court observes at the outset that the parties are in dispute about the question of whether the applicant was subjected to the use of force by the police at all (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 46-48, 17 April 2012, and compare with Muradova, cited above, § 107).
  • EGMR - 29627/10 (anhängig)

    KOVAL v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

    Was the recourse to physical force made strictly necessary by the applicants" own conduct (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 49, 17 April 2012)? In particular,.
  • EGMR - 29120/06

    MININ v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

  • EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09

    EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 32132/07

    JANNATOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 56688/12

    CHANKAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 47137/07

    TAHIROVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 46505/08

    IGBAL HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR - 31236/17 (anhängig)

    VAKHAPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR - 3490/11 (anhängig)

    KOTKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 69397/11

    ABBAS AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12

    MUSTAFA HAJILI v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 55650/07

    AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR - 25238/08 (anhängig)

    SARSEMBAYEV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  • EGMR, 13.05.2014 - 46903/07

    MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR - 75926/17 (anhängig)

    VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht