Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 40210/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAHIN v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 17, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 21086/04
DANESHPAYEH c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 40210/09
Le Gouvernement considère que la procédure interne engagée par le requérant a connu une durée excessive au sens de la jurisprudence bien établie de la Cour (Daneshpayeh c. Turquie, no 21086/04, 16 juillet 2009).The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention against Turkey, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the lack of effective domestic remedies to challenge the length of proceedings and the non-communication to the applicant of the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor (see, for example, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 132-160, ECHR 2000-XI; Meral v. Turkey, no. 33446/02, §§ 32-39, 27 November 2007; and Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, §§ 26-38, 16 July 2009).
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 40210/09
In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court does not find that these complaints disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols (as regards the complaint concerning the erroneous interpretation and evaluation by domestic courts of the facts and the relevant domestic law, see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, §§ 28-29, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 40210/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention against Turkey, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the lack of effective domestic remedies to challenge the length of proceedings and the non-communication to the applicant of the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor (see, for example, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 132-160, ECHR 2000-XI; Meral v. Turkey, no. 33446/02, §§ 32-39, 27 November 2007; and Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, §§ 26-38, 16 July 2009). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 40210/09
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 38886/05
RASMUSSEN v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 40210/09
The Court notes that where the amount of a benefit is reduced or discontinued by national authorities, this may constitute an interference with possessions which requires to be justified (see Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 40, ECHR 2004-IX, and Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, § 71, 28 April 2009).