Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,8765
EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14 (https://dejure.org/2018,8765)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.04.2018 - 29790/14 (https://dejure.org/2018,8765)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. April 2018 - 29790/14 (https://dejure.org/2018,8765)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,8765) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

    ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14
    The Court notes that its settled case-law on the examination of complaints concerning the right to respect for family life under Article 8 of the Convention implies examination of the complaints lodged by the persons in respect of whom the impugned measure was imposed and/or by their family members (see, among many examples, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no. 94; Darren Omoregie and Others v. Norway, no. 265/07, §§ 53 and 55, 31 July 2008; and Antwi and Others v. Norway, no. 26940/10, §§ 59 and 87, 14 February 2012).

    The Court reaffirms at the outset that a State is entitled, as a matter of international law and subject to its treaty obligations, to control the entry of aliens into its territory and their residence there (see, among many other authorities, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94).

  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

    Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14
    Thus, there exists between the child and his parents a bond amounting to family life (see Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000-VIII).
  • EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 18299/03

    Vorgehen bei Geiselnahme in Moskau verurteilt // Russland muss Hinterbliebene von

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14
    18299/03, 27311/03, § 196, 18 March 2010).
  • EGMR - 45886/07

    [FRE]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14
    According to its well-established case-law on the matter, it is for the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy they referred to was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that it was accessible, was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see, among many authorities, Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II, and Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 225, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 14697/18

    SHERSTOBITOVA v. RUSSIA

    The relevant general principles have been summarized in Guliyev and Sheina v. Russia, no. 29790/14, §§ 46-52, 17 April 2018.
  • EGMR, 26.07.2022 - 11005/19

    SMIRNOV AND NOVOSELOVA v. RUSSIA

    The relevant general principles have been summarized in Guliyev and Sheina v. Russia, no. 29790/14, §§ 46-52, 17 April 2018.
  • EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 296/18

    RAKHMONOVY v. RUSSIA

    For relevant general principles see Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 109, 3 October 2014, and Guliyev and Sheina v. Russia, no. 29790/14, §§ 46-52, 17 April 2018.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht