Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LAZORIVA v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LAZORIVA v. UKRAINE AND RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 60092/12

  Z.J. v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 6878/14

  Whilst Article 8 contains no explicit procedural requirements, the applicant must be involved in the decision-making process, seen as a whole, to a degree sufficient to provide him or her with the requisite protection of his interests, as safeguarded by that Article (see Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, § 147, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 52, ECHR 2000-VIII; Z.J. v. Lithuania, no. 60092/12, § 100, 29 April 2014; and W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, § 64, Series A no. 121).
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 6878/14

  6033/13 and 15 others, § 383, 17 January 2017).
• EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02

  E.B. v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 6878/14

  However, the applicant's interest in maintaining and developing her relationship or link with her nephew arguably falls within the scope of "private life", which is a broader concept and encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 43, 22 January 2008; Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, §§ 161-65, ECHR 2017 (extracts); and A.H. and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 77785/01

  ZNAMENSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 6878/14

  Close relationships short of "family life" would generally fall within the scope of "private life" (see Znamenskaya v. Russia, no. 77785/01, § 27, 2 June 2005, with further references cited therein).

• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 38321/17

  MASLÁK v. SLOVAKIA (No. 2)

  The Court reiterates that although Article 8 contains no explicit procedural requirements, the applicant must be involved in the decision-making process, seen as a whole, to a degree sufficient to provide him with the requisite protection of his interests, as safeguarded by that Article (see mutatis mutandis, Lazoriva v. Ukraine, no. 6878/14, § 63, 17 April 2018).
• EGMR, 27.05.2021 - 54978/17

  JESSICA MARCHI c. ITALIE

  Dans l'affaire Lazoriva c. Ukraine, (no 6878/14, § 66, 17 avril 2018), la Cour a jugé que le souhait de la requérante de maintenir et de développer sa relation avec son neveu âgé de cinq ans en devenant sa tutrice légale, souhait qui n'était par ailleurs pas dépourvu de base factuelle ou légale, relevait de la « vie privée ".
• EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 58282/19

  H.P. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  In both contexts regard must be had in particular to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests, subject in any event to the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the State (see, for example, Lazoriva v. Ukraine, no. 6878/14, § 62, 17 April 2018).
• EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 37197/18

  CALISTI BRUNI ET D'ANGELANTONIO c. ITALIE

  En outre, la Cour a jugé que, que le lien existant entre oncles et tantes, d'une part, et neveux et nièces, d'autre part rentrent dans le champ d'application de la notion de « vie familiale'(Boyle c. Royaume-Uni, no 16580/90, rapport de la Commission du 9 février 1993, Zampieri c. Italie (dec.), no 58194/00, 3 juin 2004 même lorsque les parents naturels sont absents, Butt c. Norvège, no 47017/09, §§ 4 et 76, 4 décembre 2012, et Jucius et Juciuviene c. Lituanie, no 14414/03, § 27, 25 novembre 2008, voir a contrario Lazoriva c. Ukraine, no 6878/14, § 65, 17 avril 2018 où la Cour a considéré que le projet de la requérante d'établir une « vie familiale ", auparavant inexistante, avec son neveu en devenant sa tutrice ne relevait pas de la « vie familiale'telle que protégée par l'article 8, mais de la vie privée).