Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WOLLAND v. NORWAY

  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  WOLLAND v. NORWAY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 21.01.2010 - 43757/05

  XAVIER DA SILVEIRA c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 39731/12

  The Court has further elaborated that the Convention does not prevent domestic law allowing for searches of a lawyer's offices as long as proper safeguards are provided, for example the presence of a representative (or president) of a bar association (see, for example, Sommer, cited above, § 56; with references to André and Another v. France, no. 18603/03, 24 July 2008 (see, in particular, §§ 42-43); Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772/99, § 69, ECHR 2003-IV; and Xavier Da Silveira v. France, no. 43757/05, §§ 37 and 43, 21 January 2010).
• EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 12323/11

  MICHAUD v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 39731/12

  Moreover, the Court has previously acknowledged the importance of specific procedural guarantees when it comes to protecting the confidentiality of exchanges between lawyer and client and of legal professional privilege (see, inter alia, Sommer, cited above, § 56; and Michaud v. France, no. 12323/11, § 130, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 06.10.2016 - 33696/11

  Steuerhinterziehung: Steuer-CDs dürfen für Strafverfolgung genutzt werden

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 39731/12

  Domestic law must further be compatible with the rule of law and accessible to the person concerned, and the person affected must be able to foresee the consequences of the domestic law for him or her (see, for example, Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 228, ECHR 2015; and K.S. and M.S v. Germany, no. 33696/11, § 34, 6 October 2016).

 
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 39731/12

  Domestic law must further be compatible with the rule of law and accessible to the person concerned, and the person affected must be able to foresee the consequences of the domestic law for him or her (see, for example, Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 228, ECHR 2015; and K.S. and M.S v. Germany, no. 33696/11, § 34, 6 October 2016).
• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  DE TOMMASO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 39731/12

  It does not compel States to allow individuals to challenge domestic laws before a national authority on the grounds of being contrary to the Convention, but seeks only to ensure that anyone who makes an arguable complaint of a violation of a Convention right will have an effective remedy in the domestic legal order (see, for example, De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 180, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.04.2017 - 73607/13

  Staatsanwalt durfte Verteidigerkonto nicht filzen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 39731/12

  When considering the necessity of an interference, the Court must be satisfied that there were sufficient and adequate guarantees against arbitrariness, including the possibility of effective control of the measure at issue (see, for instance, Sommer v. Germany, no. 73607/13, § 56, 27 April 2017; and M.N. and Others v. San Marino, no. 28005/12, § 73, 7 July 2015).
• EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 2156/10

  M v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 39731/12

  In the context of Article 8 of the Convention, the Court has held that the fundamental rule of respect for lawyer-client confidentiality may only be derogated from in exceptional cases and on condition that adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse are in place (see, for instance, M v. the Netherlands, no. 2156/10, § 88, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 14704/12

  KIRDÖK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  En ce qui concernent les garanties spéciales de procédure devant être assorties à ces mesures de saisie chez un avocat, la Cour rappelle en premier lieu qu'elles doivent être encadrées par des règles prévisibles particulièrement claires et précises quant à leur adoption et leur mise en application (Petri Sallinen et autres, précité, § 90, et Wolland c. Norvège, no 39731/12, § 62, 17 mai 2018).