Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 8217/04   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2010,62836
EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 8217/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,62836)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.06.2010 - 8217/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,62836)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. Juni 2010 - 8217/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,62836)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62836) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (20)  

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).

    Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, 17 June 2010 (IZ-77/1, Moscow, 2003-2004).

  • EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12

    ADEN AHMED v. MALTA

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 43710/07

    FETISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

    MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).".
  • EGMR, 22.09.2016 - 1574/06

    SAVCHENKO v. UKRAINE

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 8067/12

    LONIC v. CROATIA

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 56660/12

    KORNEYKOVA AND KORNEYKOV v. UKRAINE

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 52160/13

    MOXAMED ISMAACIIL AND ABDIRAHMAN WARSAME v. MALTA

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 33761/05

    TERESHCHENKO v. RUSSIA

    In other cases the Government submitted extracts from original prison records, but they were too disparate and far apart in time to present a credible refutation of the applicant's claim of severe overcrowding at the material time (see Sudarkov v. Russia, no. 3130/03, § 43, 10 July 2008; Kokoshkina v. Russia, no. 2052/08, §§ 32 and 60, 28 May 2009; and Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 54, 17 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 20.09.2012 - 31720/02

    TITARENKO v. UKRAINE

    A failure on their part to submit convincing evidence on material conditions of detention may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see Gubin v. Russia, no. 8217/04, § 56, 17 June 2010, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 113, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 19936/04

    VALERIY LOPATA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 63727/11

    ANDREY YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 39417/07

    ALIM v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 41558/05

    GLOTOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 69250/11

    ALEKSANDR VLADIMIROVICH SMIRNOV v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 26.09.2013 - 24938/06

    VITKOVSKIY v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 58104/08

    SIZOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  • EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 44292/09

    GVINIASHVILI v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 57426/14

    DVORETSKIY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 31038/09

    ONISHCHENKO AND BERDNIKOV v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht