Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 13832/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,66993) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
INVESTYLIA PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED v. CYPRUS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 13832/05
Furthermore, the Court considers that in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity the complaints lodged before it must have been previously raised before the national authorities at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, mutatis mutandis, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37 ECHR 1999-I; Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 27, Series A no. 236; and Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, Reports 1996-IV, §§ 65-69). - EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98
Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 13832/05
However, these limitations must not restrict or reduce a person's access in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired; lastly, such limitations will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if they do not pursue a legitimate aim or if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, among other authorities, Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 44, 12 July 2001, ECHR 2001-VII; Edificaciones March Gallego S.A. v. Spain, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 34; Brualla Gómez de la Torre v. Spain, judgment of 19 December 1997, Reports, § 33; and Levages Prestations Services v. France, judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, § 40). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 13832/05
Furthermore, the Court considers that in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity the complaints lodged before it must have been previously raised before the national authorities at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, mutatis mutandis, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37 ECHR 1999-I; Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 27, Series A no. 236; and Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, Reports 1996-IV, §§ 65-69). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 13832/05
However, Article 13 cannot reasonably be interpreted so as to require a remedy in domestic law in respect of any supposed grievance under the Convention that an individual may have, no matter how unmeritorious his complaint may be: the grievance must be an arguable one in terms of the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52).