Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CONSTANTINOU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06

  The Court has by its case-law established the principles and its practice concerning complaints about a violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time and about a lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of this right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, HR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06

  The Court has by its case-law established the principles and its practice concerning complaints about a violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time and about a lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of this right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, HR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06

  The Court has by its case-law established the principles and its practice concerning complaints about a violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time and about a lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of this right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, HR 2005-...).

 
• EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99

  MAJEWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06

  The Court has by its case-law established the principles and its practice concerning complaints about a violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time and about a lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of this right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, HR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 56026/00

  WENDE AND KUKOWKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06

  The Court has by its case-law established the principles and its practice concerning complaints about a violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time and about a lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of this right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, HR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

  SULWINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06

  To this end, the Court will examine the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06

  Lastly, as regards the applicant's complaint under Article 13 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that this Article applies only where an individual has "an arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see, for example, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131, and Ivison v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 39030/97, 16 April 2002).