Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 32983/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,62433) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MERTENA v. LATVIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 30779/05
MELNITIS v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 32983/08
However, once this burden has been satisfied it falls to the applicant to establish that use was made of the remedy advanced by the Government or that it was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case, or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from the requirement (see Melnitis v Latvia, no. 30779/05, § 46, 28 February 2012, with further references). - EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 58497/08
TRUPS v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 32983/08
The relevant legal provisions and the domestic case-law concerning the right to completion of criminal proceedings within a "reasonable time" have been summarised in the case Trups v. Latvia (dec.) (no. 58497/08, §§ 16-33, 20 November 2012). - EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 71072/01
LEJA v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 32983/08
At the relevant time Article 111 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provided that the offence of inflicting minor bodily injuries belonged in the category of private prosecution cases which had to be brought by a plaintiff directly before the court with jurisdiction (see Leja v. Latvia, no. 71072/01, §§ 35-36, 14 June 2011).