Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
G.B. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (18) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96
ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
While Article 5 § 4 does not impose an obligation on a court examining an objection against detention to address every argument contained in the detainee's submissions, its guarantees would be deprived of their substance if the court treated as irrelevant, or disregarded, concrete facts invoked by the detainee and capable of putting into doubt the existence of the conditions essential for the "lawfulness", in the sense of the Convention, of the deprivation of liberty (see, mutatis mutandis, Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, § 94, 26 July 2001). - EGMR, 19.01.2012 - 39472/07
POPOV c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
The Court has already had occasion to rule on the detention of children in custodial facilities in an immigration context in cases such as Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v Belgium (no. 13178/03, §§ 50-59, ECHR 2006-XI), Muskhadzhiyeva and Others v. Belgium (no. 41442/07, §§ 55-63, 19 January 2010), Rahimi v. Greece (no. 8687/08, §§ 85-86, 5 April 2011), Popov v. France (nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, §§ 91-103, 19 January 2012), A.B. and Others v. France (no. 11593/12, §§ 110-15, 12 July 2016), Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta (nos. 25794/13 and 28151/13, §§ 105-15, 22 November 2016), and S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 8138/16, §§ 78-93, 7 December 2017). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 143-59, 10 January 2012).
- EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98
Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
When assessing conditions of detention, account must be taken of the cumulative effects of these conditions, as well as of specific allegations made by the applicant (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
In this connection, it is inconceivable that in a State subject to the rule of law a person should continue to be deprived of his or her liberty despite the existence of a court order for his or her release (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 173, ECHR 2004-II). - EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 30471/08
ABDOLKHANI ET KARIMNIA c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
The Court refers to its general principles under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention relating to the control of the liberty of aliens in an immigration context (see, for instance, A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, §§ 162-64, ECHR 2009, and Abdolkhani and Karimnia v Turkey, no. 30471/08, §§ 128-30, 22 September 2009). - EGMR, 04.06.2015 - 5425/11
RUSLAN YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
Administrative formalities connected with release cannot justify a delay of more than a few hours (see, for instance, Ruslan Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 5425/11, §§ 68 and 69, ECHR 2015, where a delay of two days led to a violation of Article 5 § 1). - EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 8138/16
Bulgarien, minderjährig, Haftbedingungen, Rechtswegerschöpfung, Schadensersatz, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
The Court has already had occasion to rule on the detention of children in custodial facilities in an immigration context in cases such as Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v Belgium (no. 13178/03, §§ 50-59, ECHR 2006-XI), Muskhadzhiyeva and Others v. Belgium (no. 41442/07, §§ 55-63, 19 January 2010), Rahimi v. Greece (no. 8687/08, §§ 85-86, 5 April 2011), Popov v. France (nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, §§ 91-103, 19 January 2012), A.B. and Others v. France (no. 11593/12, §§ 110-15, 12 July 2016), Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta (nos. 25794/13 and 28151/13, §§ 105-15, 22 November 2016), and S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 8138/16, §§ 78-93, 7 December 2017). - EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 8687/08
RAHIMI c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
The Court has already had occasion to rule on the detention of children in custodial facilities in an immigration context in cases such as Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v Belgium (no. 13178/03, §§ 50-59, ECHR 2006-XI), Muskhadzhiyeva and Others v. Belgium (no. 41442/07, §§ 55-63, 19 January 2010), Rahimi v. Greece (no. 8687/08, §§ 85-86, 5 April 2011), Popov v. France (nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, §§ 91-103, 19 January 2012), A.B. and Others v. France (no. 11593/12, §§ 110-15, 12 July 2016), Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta (nos. 25794/13 and 28151/13, §§ 105-15, 22 November 2016), and S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 8138/16, §§ 78-93, 7 December 2017). - EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 12535/04
ARTIMENCO c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15
seq., ECHR 2002-VI; and Artimenco v. Romania, no. 12535/04, §§ 31-33, 30 June 2009). - EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 11593/12
A.B. ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12
ADEN AHMED v. MALTA
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 18.11.2021 - 15670/18
Vorfall in Kroatien: Recht auf Leben an EU-Außengrenze verletzt
39472/07 and 39474/07, 19 January 2012; A.B. and Others v. France, no. 11593/12, 12 July 2016; Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts); S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 8138/16, 7 December 2017; G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, 17 October 2019; and R.R. and Others v. Hungary, no. 36037/17, 2 March 2021. - EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 80206/17
J.A. AND A.A. v. TÜRKIYE
Domestic law 21. A description of the relevant domestic law and practice at the material time can be found in G.B. and Others v. Turkey (no. 4633/15, §§ 42-44, 17 October 2019). - EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 11356/17
BILYY v. UKRAINE
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, §§ 84-87, 10 February 2011), Kotiy v. Ukraine (no. 28718/09, § 55, 5 March 2015), G.B. and Others v. Turkey (no. 4633/15, § 176, 17 October 2019), and Ignatov v. Ukraine (no. 40583/15, §§ 40-47, 15 December 2016).5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - failure by the courts to address the applicant's arguments raised in his applications for alternative preventive measures (Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, § 85, 10 February 2011 and G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, § 176, 17 October 2019);.
- EGMR - 36916/19 (anhängig)
M.A. v. TÜRKIYE
Were the conditions of the applicant's detention at the Gaziantep Foreigners' Removal Centre compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, §§ 51-91, 24 June 2014; Erkenov v. Turkey, no. 18152/11, §§ 26-42, 6 September 2016; G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 114-117, 17 October 2019)?.Did the applicant have at his disposal a remedy by which he could challenge the lawfulness of his deprivation of liberty, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, for example, A.M. v. France, no. 56324/13, §§ 40-41, 12 July 2016, and G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 156-188, 17 October 2019)?.
- EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 14693/20
GORBACHOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Kharchenko (cited above, §§ 84-87) and G.B. and Others v. Turkey (no. 4633/15, § 176, 17 October 2019).5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - Failure by the courts to address the applicant's arguments raised in his applications for release and his appeals (G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, § 176, 17 October 2019).
- EGMR - 48908/20 (anhängig)
F.R. v. TÜRKIYE
Were the conditions of the applicant's detention at the Erzurum, Izmir and Aydin Foreigners' Removal Centres compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, §§ 51-91, 24 June 2014; Erkenov v. Turkey, no. 18152/11, §§ 26-42, 6 September 2016; G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 99-117, 17 October 2019)?.Did the applicant have at his disposal a remedy by which he could challenge the lawfulness of his deprivation of liberty, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, for example, A.M. v. France, no. 56324/13, §§ 40-41, 12 July 2016, and G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 163-69, 17 October 2019)?.
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 10940/17
M.H. AND S.B. v. HUNGARY
Various international bodies, including the Council of Europe, are increasingly calling on States to expeditiously and completely cease or eradicate the immigration detention of children (see G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 67-79 and 151, 17 October 2019, and M.H. and Others v. Croatia, cited above, § 236). - EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 22060/20
SPERISEN c. SUISSE
Si la juridiction interne n'expose aucun motif adéquat ou rend plusieurs décisions stéréotypées n'offrant aucune réponse aux arguments du requérant, il peut y avoir violation en ce que la garantie prévue par l'article 5 § 4 se retrouverait vidée de sa substance (G.B. et autres c. Turquie, no 4633/15, § 176, 17 octobre 2019). - EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 12427/22
A.D. v. MALTA
Moreover, the Court has already held that the extreme vulnerability of children - whether or not they were accompanied by their parents - was a decisive factor that took precedence over considerations relating to the child's status as an illegal immigrant (see G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, § 101, 17 October 2019, and M.H. and Others v. Croatia, nos. 15670/18 and 43115/18, § 184, 18 November 2021). - EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 57035/18
M.D. ET A.D. c. FRANCE
Droit et pratique internationaux 41. Les éléments du droit et de la pratique internationaux relatifs à la rétention des mineurs sont rappelés dans les arrêts A.B. et autres c. France, précité, §§ 60-88, et G.B. et autres c. Turquie, no 4633/15, §§ 67-81, 17 octobre 2019. - EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 23685/14
BILALOVA ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
NIKOGHOSYAN AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR - 32/21 (anhängig)
M.H. v. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 26879/17
MINASIAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR - 19111/22 (anhängig)
M. D. AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR - 37188/19 (anhängig)
QOBILOVA AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR - 32654/18 (anhängig)
PĘDRAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 25479/19
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, INC. c. TURQUIE