Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 11932/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,56947) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LOMAKIN v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95
JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 11932/03
However, even where a statement amounts to a value judgment, the proportionality of an interference may depend on whether there exists a sufficient factual basis for the impugned statement, since even a value judgment without any factual basis to support it may be excessive (see Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 11932/03
It remains to be considered whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society", that is whether it corresponded to a "pressing social need", whether it was proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued and whether the reasons given by the national authorities to justify it are "relevant and sufficient" (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 38, § 62).