Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  METZGER v. GERMANY

  Art. 10, Art. 7, Art. 6 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  The Court recalls that, when speaking of "law", Article 7 alludes to the very same concept as that to which the Convention refers elsewhere when using that term, a concept which comprises written as well as unwritten law and implies qualitative requirements, notably those of accessibility and foreseeability (see, inter alia, S.W. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335, pp. 41-42, §§ 34-35; Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], no. 34044/96, 35532/97, 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 22.11.1995 - 20166/92

  S.W. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  The Court recalls that, when speaking of "law", Article 7 alludes to the very same concept as that to which the Convention refers elsewhere when using that term, a concept which comprises written as well as unwritten law and implies qualitative requirements, notably those of accessibility and foreseeability (see, inter alia, S.W. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335, pp. 41-42, §§ 34-35; Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], no. 34044/96, 35532/97, 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001-II).
• BVerfG, 10.10.1995 - 1 BvR 1476/91

  "Soldaten sind Mörder"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  According to the well-established case-law of the German courts, notably the Federal Constitutional Court (see, in particular, nos. 1 BvR 1476/91, 1 BvR 1980/91, 1 BvR 102/92 and 1 BvR 221/92, decision of 10 October 1995, Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGE), vol.

 
• EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 41205/98

  TAMMER v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see, for example, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, § 49; Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, § 37, ECHR 2001-I).
• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95

  JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  Despite this, the latter cannot be considered as public figures like politicians who knowingly lay themselves open to close scrutiny of their words and deeds and must display a greater degree of tolerance (see in this respect Wabl v. Austria, no. 24773/94, § 42, 21 March 2000; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 38, ECHR 2001-II; Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v. Austria, no. 39394/98, § 30, ECHR 2003-XI; Pedersen and Baadsgaard, cited above, § 80).
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 28525/95

  UNABHÄNGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  Where a statement amounts to a value judgment the proportionality of an interference may depend on whether there exists a sufficient factual basis for the impugned statement, since even a value judgment without any factual basis to support it may be excessive (see, for example, Unabhängige Initiative Informationsvielfalt v. Austria, no. 28525/95, §§ 39-40, ECHR 2002-I; Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 76, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 39394/98

  SCHARSACH ET NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  Despite this, the latter cannot be considered as public figures like politicians who knowingly lay themselves open to close scrutiny of their words and deeds and must display a greater degree of tolerance (see in this respect Wabl v. Austria, no. 24773/94, § 42, 21 March 2000; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 38, ECHR 2001-II; Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v. Austria, no. 39394/98, § 30, ECHR 2003-XI; Pedersen and Baadsgaard, cited above, § 80).
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see, for example, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, § 49; Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, § 37, ECHR 2001-I).
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 56720/00

  It recalls that under the Convention, a criminal sentence or an award of damages for defamation must bear a reasonable relationship of proportionality to the injury to reputation suffered (see, inter alia, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, p. 75, § 49; Krutil v. Germany, no. 71750/01, 20 March 2003; Steel and Morris, cited above, § 96; Independent News and Media and Independent Newspapers Ireland Limited v. Ireland, no. 55120/00, § 110, 16 June 2005).

• EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 21556/14

  LAZARESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Toutefois, la Cour doit prendre en considération les circonstances particulières de l'espèce, et notamment le sérieux des accusations proférées par le requérant contre P.S.A. (voir, mutatis mutandis, Metzger c. Allemagne (déc.), no 56720/00, 17 novembre 2005) et le fait que la véracité des accusations en question n'a pas été démontrée (voir, par exemple, C.V. Tudor c. Roumanie (déc.), no 6928/04, 15 juin 2006).