Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 37755/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,67515) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
O. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 18.10.2006 - 46410/99
Rechtssache ÜNER gegen die NIEDERLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 37755/06
It is the Court's settled case-law that Contracting States have the right as a matter of international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 109, 17 July 2008; and Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII). - EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02
BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 37755/06
The Court reiterates that, according to its constant case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02, § 189, ECHR 2008-... (extracts); and Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131). - EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 25904/07
Sri Lanka, Tamilen, Europäischer Menschenrechtsgerichtshof, menschenrechtswidrige …
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 37755/06
It is the Court's settled case-law that Contracting States have the right as a matter of international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 109, 17 July 2008; and Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 37755/06
Referring to the general principles under Article 3 of the Convention as defined by the Court in its judgments in the cases of Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, (judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215) and Venkadajalasarma v. the Netherlands, (no. 58510/00, 17 February 2004), the Administrative Jurisdiction Division held:. - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 37755/06
The Court reiterates that, according to its constant case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02, § 189, ECHR 2008-... (extracts); and Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).