Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 1318/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43003) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SCHIFFER AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SCHIFFER AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02
GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 1318/15
The Court reiterates that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 71, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 84, 3 May 2007; Muratovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 41698/06, § 15, 21 March 2017; and Domján v. Hungary (dec.), no. 5433/17, § 33, 14 November 2017). - EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 5433/17
DOMJÁN v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 1318/15
The Court reiterates that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 71, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 84, 3 May 2007; Muratovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 41698/06, § 15, 21 March 2017; and Domján v. Hungary (dec.), no. 5433/17, § 33, 14 November 2017). - EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 1318/15
The Court reiterates that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 71, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 84, 3 May 2007; Muratovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 41698/06, § 15, 21 March 2017; and Domján v. Hungary (dec.), no. 5433/17, § 33, 14 November 2017). - EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 41698/06
MURATOVIC v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 1318/15
The Court reiterates that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 71, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 84, 3 May 2007; Muratovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 41698/06, § 15, 21 March 2017; and Domján v. Hungary (dec.), no. 5433/17, § 33, 14 November 2017).