Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 63821/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43006) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WIERZBICKI v. POLAND
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
WIERZBICKI v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 63821/16
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01
BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 63821/16
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about prison conditions and the right to respect for private life (see, mutatis mutandis, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007; Vala?.inas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 104, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Szafranski v. Poland, cited above). - EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 63821/16
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about prison conditions and the right to respect for private life (see, mutatis mutandis, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007; Vala?.inas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 104, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Szafranski v. Poland, cited above).