Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 21291/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,38663) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOZAK contre UKRAINE
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOZAK v. UKRAINE
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 21291/02
However, inherent to the Convention are the notions of legal certainty and the rule of law (see e.g. the Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, § 58, and the Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v Greece judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, § 49). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 21291/02
However, inherent to the Convention are the notions of legal certainty and the rule of law (see e.g. the Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, § 58, and the Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v Greece judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, § 49).
- EGMR, 06.10.2011 - 23465/03
AGROKOMPLEKS v. UKRAINE
The Court notes that, indeed, as it has made it clear in many cases against Ukraine, it is competent to examine the facts of an application for their compatibility with the Convention only in so far as they occurred after 11 September 1997 (see, for example, Kozak v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21291/02, ECHR 2002-X). - EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 46639/99
BAN c. ROUMANIE
La Cour rappelle que l'article 6 § 1 est inapplicable aux procédures extraordinaires ayant pour but la réouverture d'une affaire terminée définitivement par un jugement passé en force de chose jugée (Kozak c. Ukraine, (déc.), no 21291/02, CEDH 2002-X). - EGMR, 04.09.2003 - 13338/03
AO
In such circumstances, the applicant company's recourse to this newly available remedy to challenge proceedings which had been brought to an end by a final decision must be seen as akin to a request to re-open those proceedings by means of the extraordinary transitional remedy (see, mutatis mutandis, Kozak v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21291/02, 17 December 2002). - EGMR, 03.04.2007 - 43788/05
KARUNA v. UKRAINE
Thus, requests to re-hear cases lodged with it are akin to requests for re-opening of the proceedings (see Kozak v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21291/02, ECHR 2002-X).