Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2, Prot... okoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 44240/12

  The Court would be straying outside its given role were it to identify on its own the remedies the Government had in mind (compare Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 26, Series A no. 35).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 44240/12

  In deciding whether the administrative proceedings against the applicant concerning the incident of 12 January 2013 were fair, the Court will examine them as a whole (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B).
• EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03

  Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 44240/12

  The Court reiterates that the notion of the "same offence" - the "idem" element of the ne bis in idem principle in Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - is to be understood as prohibiting the prosecution or conviction of a second "offence" in so far as it arises from identical facts or facts which are substantially the same (see Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 78-84, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 18114/02

  HERMI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 44240/12

  Having examined the parties" submissions, the Court accepts that the applicant waived his right to take part in the appeal proceedings and that his waiver was attended by adequate procedural safeguards (see Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 73, ECHR 2006-XII).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 44240/12

  It remains for the Court to determine whether the appellate court afforded redress for the violation of the applicant's rights (see De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 33, Series A no. 86).

• EGMR, 14.04.2022 - 60699/11

  BESEDA v. RUSSIA

  Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the applicant's complaints related to the judgments of 25 April 2006 and 1 January 2007 (compare Yakovlev v. Russia [Committee], no. 44240/12 and 2 others, §§ 97-102, 17 December 2019).