Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KEHAYOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 41035/98
• EGMR, 13.03.2003 - 41035/98
• EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

  When assessing conditions of detention, account has to be taken of the cumulative effects of those conditions and the duration of the detention (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 102, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

  In cases which concerned the system of detention pending trial as it existed in Bulgaria until 1 January 2000, the Court found that neither investigators before whom accused persons were brought, nor prosecutors who approved detention orders, could be considered to be "officer[s] authorised by law to exercise judicial power" within the meaning of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, cited above, Nikolova v. Bulgaria, cited above, and Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, ECHR 2003-I (extracts).
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 50901/99

  VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

  In assessing whether a restrictive regime may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 in a given case, regard must be had to the particular conditions, the stringency of the regime, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (see Messina v. Italy (dec.), no. 25498/94, ECHR 1999-V, Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, § 51, ECHR 2003-II and Iorgov v. Bulgaria, no. 40653/98, §§ 83-87, 11 March 2004).

 
• EGMR, 11.03.2004 - 40653/98

  IORGOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

  In assessing whether a restrictive regime may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 in a given case, regard must be had to the particular conditions, the stringency of the regime, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (see Messina v. Italy (dec.), no. 25498/94, ECHR 1999-V, Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, § 51, ECHR 2003-II and Iorgov v. Bulgaria, no. 40653/98, §§ 83-87, 11 March 2004).
• EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10444/83

  LAMY c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

  Equality of arms is not ensured if counsel is denied access to those documents in the investigation file which are essential in order effectively to challenge the lawfulness, in the sense of the Convention, of his client's detention (see, among other authorities, Lamy v. Belgium, judgment of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151, pp. 16-17, § 29, Nikolova v. Bulgaria, cited above, § 58, and Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, §§ 39-43, 13 February 2001, unreported).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 41035/98

  When assessing conditions of detention, account has to be taken of the cumulative effects of those conditions and the duration of the detention (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 102, ECHR 2002-VI).

• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

  Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

  The absence of an intention of humiliating or debasing a detainee by placing him or her in poor conditions, while being a factor to be taken into account, does not conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no. 41035/98, § 63, 18 January 2005).
• EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 6936/03

  STAN c. ROUMANIE

  En outre, il s'est vu octroyer comme dédommagement un montant qui est comparable à ce qu'il aurait pu obtenir si la Cour avait constaté une violation de l'article 3 (voir, mutatis mutandis, Kalachnikov c. Russie, no 47095/99, CEDH 2002-VI, Kehayov c. Bulgarie, no 41035/98, 18 janvier 2005, Mouisel c. France, no 67263/01, CEDH 2002-IX, Sarban c. Moldova, no 3456/05, 4 octobre 2005, et Bragadireanu c. Roumanie, no 22088/04, 6 décembre 2007).
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12

  MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

  That notwithstanding, the Court has consistently held that the absence of an intention to humiliate or debase a detainee by placing him or her in poor conditions, while being a factor to be taken into account, does not conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no. 41035/98, § 63, 18 January 2005).
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 6817/02

  IORDACHE c. ROUMANIE

  Il estime aussi qu'étant donné qu'une partie des griefs ont été déclarés irrecevables, la Cour devrait réduire proportionnellement la somme octroyée (Kehayov c. Bulgarie, no 41035/98, § 94, 18 janvier 2005).