Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3899/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,436
EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3899/08 (https://dejure.org/2018,436)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18.01.2018 - 3899/08 (https://dejure.org/2018,436)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18. Januar 2018 - 3899/08 (https://dejure.org/2018,436)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,436) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence) (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

    ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3899/08
    The presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of a fair criminal trial that is required by paragraph 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172/13, § 125, 22 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

    Minelli ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3899/08
    It not only prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person charged with a criminal offence is guilty before he has been so proved according to the law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 38, Series A no. 62), but also covers statements or actions made by other public officials about pending criminal investigations, which encourage the public to believe the suspect guilty and prejudge the assessment of the facts by the competent judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; and Ürfi Çetinkaya v. Turkey, no. 19866/04, § 139, 23 July 2013).
  • EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 42095/98

    DAKTARAS c. LITUANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3899/08
    It not only prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person charged with a criminal offence is guilty before he has been so proved according to the law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 38, Series A no. 62), but also covers statements or actions made by other public officials about pending criminal investigations, which encourage the public to believe the suspect guilty and prejudge the assessment of the facts by the competent judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; and Ürfi Çetinkaya v. Turkey, no. 19866/04, § 139, 23 July 2013).
  • EGMR, 22.05.2014 - 15172/13

    ILGAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 3899/08
    The presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of a fair criminal trial that is required by paragraph 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172/13, § 125, 22 May 2014).
  • EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17

    SARDAR BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    The Court notes at the outset that the State may be held responsible in the context of Article 6 § 2 of the Convention for the actions of private media outlets only in specific circumstances (see Y.B. and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48173/99 and 48319/99, §§ 48-50, 28 October 2004, compare also Huseynov v. Azerbaijan [Committee], no. 3899/08, §§ 42-43, 18 January 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht