Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABBASOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 69582/01

  SARDINE c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  The Court reiterates that quashing of a judgment by means of supervisory review is an instantaneous act, which does not create a continuing situation (see Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, 12 February 2004).
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 30672/03

  SOBELIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  The relevant domestic law governing the supervisory review procedure at the material time is summed up in the Court's judgment in the case of Sobelin and Others v. Russia (nos. 30672/03 et seq., §§ 33-42, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 2191/03

  PRIDATCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  In 2001-2004 judgments delivered against the public authorities were executed in accordance with a special procedure established, inter alia, by Government's Decree No. 143 of 22 February 2001 and, subsequently, by Decree No. 666 of 22 September 2002, entrusting execution to the Ministry of Finance (see further details in Pridatchenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 2191/03, 3104/03, 16094/03 and 24486/03, §§ 33-39, 21 June 2007).

 
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  KULKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  The Court has already assessed the effectiveness of the remedies quoted by the Government and concluded that they did not satisfy the Convention requirements at the material time (see Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et seq., §§ 42-47, 8 January 2009).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  While the first period can arguably be considered as reasonable, the second one is incompatible with the requirements of the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, §§ 66-67, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 5249/06

  ZHURAVLEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  It follows that these complaints are incompatible ratione temporis with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 (see Zhuravlev v. Russia, no. 5249/06, § 17, 15 January 2009).