Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64494) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LESJAK v. CROATIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
- EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 25904/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 11.01.2001 - 38460/97
PLATAKOU v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
The Court cannot accept that the procedure followed by the Administrative Court should be so rigidly formal (see, mutatis mutandis, Platakou v. Greece, no. 38460/97, § 43, ECHR 2001-I). - EGMR, 28.02.2008 - 37878/02
TSERKVA SELA SOSULIVKA v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
In the Court's view, that situation amounts to a denial of justice which impaired the very essence of the applicant's right of access to a court as secured by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Beneficio Cappella Paolini v. San Marino, no. 40786/98, § 29, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts), and Tserkva Sela Sosulivka v. Ukraine, no. 37878/02, § 40, 28 February 2008). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 23805/94
BELLET c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
For the right of access to be effective, an individual must have a clear, practical opportunity to challenge an act interfering with his or her rights (see, for example, Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, § 36, Series A no. 333-B).
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
The right of access, namely the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect of this "right to a court" (see, notably, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 28-36, Series A no. 18). - EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
However, having regard to its above findings under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, there has also been a violation of Article 14 thereof (see, among other authorities, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 30, Series A no. 32). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 25904/06
However, these limitations must not restrict or reduce the access left to an individual in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see, for example, Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93).