Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 55137/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,22556) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CIMENDAG v. SWITZERLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96
Schießbefehl
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 55137/12
The object and purpose of the guarantee in Article 7 is to provide effective safeguards against arbitrary prosecution, conviction and punishment (see Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04
KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 55137/12
As regards foreseeability, the Court has held that an individual must be able to know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the courts" interpretation of it, what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable and what penalty will be imposed (see Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 140, ECHR 2008). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 55137/12
While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140; Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, 9 June 1998, § 34, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV; and Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935/02, § 84, 1 March 2007).