Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 36545/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,2218) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OPREA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
OPREA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 19.10.2012 - 43370/04
Transnistrien
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 36545/06
As they did in Mozer (cited above, §§ 92-94), the Russian Government expressed the view that the approach to the issue of jurisdiction taken by the Court in Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII), Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012) and Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011) had been wrong and at variance with public international law. - EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23687/05
IVANTOC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 36545/06
As they did in Mozer (cited above, §§ 92-94), the Russian Government expressed the view that the approach to the issue of jurisdiction taken by the Court in Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII), Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012) and Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011) had been wrong and at variance with public international law.