Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 30640/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,10001) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAMMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MAMMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 2476/02
THÉVENON c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 30640/09
In these circumstances, the Court is bound to find it of decisive importance that the person wishing to pursue the application is neither a close relative nor an heir of the applicant and that he has provided no evidence of his legitimate interest (see Bruzitis, v. Latvia (dec.), no. 15028/04, § 49, 26 August 2014; Léger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02, § 50, 30 March 2009; Thévenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III; and Burlya and Others v. Ukraine, no. 3289/10, §§ 70-73, 6 November 2018). - EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 3289/10
BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 30640/09
In these circumstances, the Court is bound to find it of decisive importance that the person wishing to pursue the application is neither a close relative nor an heir of the applicant and that he has provided no evidence of his legitimate interest (see Bruzitis, v. Latvia (dec.), no. 15028/04, § 49, 26 August 2014; Léger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02, § 50, 30 March 2009; Thévenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III; and Burlya and Others v. Ukraine, no. 3289/10, §§ 70-73, 6 November 2018). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 30640/09
In this respect, the Court notes that, where an applicant has died after the application was lodged, it has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014, with further references).
- EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 60421/11
OSMANLI v. AZERBAIJAN
Against this background, the Court finds that no clearly expressed request to pursue the proceedings has been submitted by a person providing evidence of his or her legitimate interest to pursue the application (see Romanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 35627/14, 6 October 2022), with further references, and Mammadova v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 30640/09, 18 February 2021, with further references).