Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GANIYEVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GANIYEVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06

  KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  The Court has accepted that the next of kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014, and Ksenz and Others v. Russia, nos. 45044/06 and 5 others, § 86, 12 December 2017).
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 45875/06

  RAFIG ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  The issue of whether a fair balance has been struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights only becomes relevant once it has been established that the interference in question satisfied the requirement of lawfulness and was not arbitrary (see Iatridis, cited above, § 58; Rafig Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 45875/06, § 119, 6 December 2011; and Fedulov v. Russia, no. 53068/08, § 75, 8 October 2019).
• EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 35432/07

  MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  However, for reasons of convenience, the text of this judgment will continue to refer to Mr Mammadkhanov and Mr Hasanov as "the applicants", even though Ms Mammadkhanova and Mr Hasanli are today to be regarded as having the status of applicant before the Court (see Gulub Atanasov v. Bulgaria, no. 73281/01, § 42, 6 November 2008; Isayeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 36229/11, § 62, 25 June 2015; and Mammadov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 35432/07, § 80, 21 February 2019).

 
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 53068/08

  FEDULOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  The issue of whether a fair balance has been struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights only becomes relevant once it has been established that the interference in question satisfied the requirement of lawfulness and was not arbitrary (see Iatridis, cited above, § 58; Rafig Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 45875/06, § 119, 6 December 2011; and Fedulov v. Russia, no. 53068/08, § 75, 8 October 2019).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  The Court notes that in various cases in which an applicant has died in the course of the Convention proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among other authorities, Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX; Pisarkiewicz v. Poland, no. 18967/02, §§ 30-33, 22 January 2008; and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, §§ 27-30, 8 April 2014).
• EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 73359/10

  ERGEZEN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  The Court notes that in various cases in which an applicant has died in the course of the Convention proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among other authorities, Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX; Pisarkiewicz v. Poland, no. 18967/02, §§ 30-33, 22 January 2008; and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, §§ 27-30, 8 April 2014).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  The Court has accepted that the next of kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014, and Ksenz and Others v. Russia, nos. 45044/06 and 5 others, § 86, 12 December 2017).
• EGMR, 25.06.2015 - 36229/11

  ISAYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 62490/09

  However, for reasons of convenience, the text of this judgment will continue to refer to Mr Mammadkhanov and Mr Hasanov as "the applicants", even though Ms Mammadkhanova and Mr Hasanli are today to be regarded as having the status of applicant before the Court (see Gulub Atanasov v. Bulgaria, no. 73281/01, § 42, 6 November 2008; Isayeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 36229/11, § 62, 25 June 2015; and Mammadov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 35432/07, § 80, 21 February 2019).