Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 9939/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,51484) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PEKINEL v. TURKEY
Art. 6 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 9939/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 29279/95
SAHINER v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 9939/02
It must nevertheless take account of the state of the proceedings at that time (see Sahiner v. Turkey, no. 29279/95, § 21, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 9939/02
The domestic courts are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case and for interpreting and applying rules of substantive and procedural law (see, amongst many authorities, Vidal v. Belgium, judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 32).
- EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 61815/13
VAZVAN v. FINLAND
This applies in particular to the interpretation by the courts of rules of a procedural nature (see Pekinel v. Turkey, no. 9939/02, § 53, 18 March 2008). - EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 23410/09
STELIOS SCHINAS-SPILIOS KAISARIS KOINOPRAXIA v. GREECE
The domestic courts are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case and for interpreting and applying rules of substantive and procedural law (see Pekinel v. Turkey, no. 9939/02, § 53, 18 March 2008). - EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 46400/09
FELLAS v. GREECE
The domestic courts are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case and for interpreting and applying rules of substantive and procedural law (see Pekinel v. Turkey, no. 9939/02, § 53, 18 March 2008). - EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 16047/04
ALKES v. TURKEY (No. 2)
This applies in particular to the interpretation by the courts of rules of a procedural nature (Pekinel v. Turkey, no. 9939/02, § 53, 18 March 2008). - EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 38147/12
KUOKKANEN AND JOHANNESDAHL v. FINLAND
This applies in particular to the interpretation by the courts of rules of a procedural nature (see Pekinel v. Turkey, no. 9939/02, § 53, 18 March 2008).