Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 46706/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,22399) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IGNAOUA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 07.03.2000 - 43844/98
Dubliner Übereinkommen, Dublinverfahren, Großbritannien, Sri Lanka, sichere …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 46706/08
The indirect removal of the applicants to an intermediary country which is also a Contracting State does not affect the responsibility of the United Kingdom to ensure that the applicants are not, as a result of its decision to surrender, exposed to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (T.I. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43844/98, ECHR 2000-III; and K.R.S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32733/08, 2 December 2008). - EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99
MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 46706/08
Article 13 is therefore inapplicable to their case (see, for example, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and P. v. the United Kingdom (dec), no. 1529/10, 12 November 2013). - EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 32733/08
Dublin II-VO, Dublinverfahren, Griechenland, Großbritannien, Refoulement, Iran, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 46706/08
The indirect removal of the applicants to an intermediary country which is also a Contracting State does not affect the responsibility of the United Kingdom to ensure that the applicants are not, as a result of its decision to surrender, exposed to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (T.I. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43844/98, ECHR 2000-III; and K.R.S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32733/08, 2 December 2008).
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 1529/10
P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 46706/08
Article 13 is therefore inapplicable to their case (see, for example, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and P. v. the United Kingdom (dec), no. 1529/10, 12 November 2013). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 46706/08
Finally, as regards the applicants" Article 13 complaint, the Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees the availability at national level of a remedy where there is an "arguable claim" of a violation of a substantive Convention provision (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131). - EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89
CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 46706/08
They argued that the compatibility of their surrender with Article 3 had to be assessed at the time of their transfer (citing Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201).