Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GRUBIC v. CROATIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial ...

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 24510/06

  ABDULGADIROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 33602/17

  The Supreme Court was therefore called upon to make a full assessment of his guilt or innocence in respect of the charges against him in the light not only of the arguments he had put forward before the courts below, but also of his arguments concerning the alleged failures of those courts to establish all the relevant facts and to apply the applicable substantive and procedural rules correctly (see Lonic, cited above, § 99, and compare Abdulgadirov v. Azerbaijan, no. 24510/06, § 42, 20 June 2013, and Kozlitin v. Russia, no. 17092/04, § 63, 14 November 2013; and contrast Fejde v. Sweden, 29 October 1991, § 33, Series A no. 212-C, and Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 85, ECHR 2006-XII).
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 17092/04

  KOZLITIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 33602/17

  The Supreme Court was therefore called upon to make a full assessment of his guilt or innocence in respect of the charges against him in the light not only of the arguments he had put forward before the courts below, but also of his arguments concerning the alleged failures of those courts to establish all the relevant facts and to apply the applicable substantive and procedural rules correctly (see Lonic, cited above, § 99, and compare Abdulgadirov v. Azerbaijan, no. 24510/06, § 42, 20 June 2013, and Kozlitin v. Russia, no. 17092/04, § 63, 14 November 2013; and contrast Fejde v. Sweden, 29 October 1991, § 33, Series A no. 212-C, and Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 85, ECHR 2006-XII).
• EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 12631/87

  FEJDE c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 33602/17

  The Supreme Court was therefore called upon to make a full assessment of his guilt or innocence in respect of the charges against him in the light not only of the arguments he had put forward before the courts below, but also of his arguments concerning the alleged failures of those courts to establish all the relevant facts and to apply the applicable substantive and procedural rules correctly (see Lonic, cited above, § 99, and compare Abdulgadirov v. Azerbaijan, no. 24510/06, § 42, 20 June 2013, and Kozlitin v. Russia, no. 17092/04, § 63, 14 November 2013; and contrast Fejde v. Sweden, 29 October 1991, § 33, Series A no. 212-C, and Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 85, ECHR 2006-XII).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 33602/17

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).

• EGMR - 40801/22 (anhängig)

  X v. SERBIA

  Has the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court been excessive and, as such, in breach of the "reasonable time" requirement contained in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Milovanovic, cited above, §§ 87-90, and Grubic v. Croatia, no. 33602/17, §§ 34-41, 18 March 2021)?.