Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 38312/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,69556) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SRPSKA PRAVOSLAVNA CRKVENA OPSTINA NA RIJECI v. CROATIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 38312/02
In this respect the Court further recalls that the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 allows Contracting States to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest, by enforcing such laws as they deem necessary for the purpose, which means that there must exist a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised (see Sporrong and Lönnroth judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 24, § 64; Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden judgment of 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 16, § 54). - EGMR, 25.10.1989 - 10842/84
ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 38312/02
In this respect the Court further recalls that the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 allows Contracting States to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest, by enforcing such laws as they deem necessary for the purpose, which means that there must exist a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised (see Sporrong and Lönnroth judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 24, § 64; Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden judgment of 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 16, § 54). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10522/83
Mellacher u.a. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 38312/02
As regards the purpose of the measures, the Court must respect the domestic legislature's judgment as to what is in the general interest, unless that judgment was manifestly without reasonable foundation (see Mellacher and Others v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 169, p. 26, § 45).