Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 4493/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,40301) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 34 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 25.11.2004 - 4493/04
- EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 4493/04
- EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 4493/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99
Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 4493/04
Furthermore, the Court ïnds that the conditions of detention at Lefortovo and "Matrosskaya Tishina", as described by the applicant, were of such a character that the applicant's detention could not be considered as being contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see, in contrast, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 92-103, ECHR 2002-VI). - EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 26756/95
NOWOJSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 4493/04
Nevertheless, Article 3 does not oblige the State to release a prisoner or to transfer him to a civil hospital, even if his illness is particularly difficult to treat (see Nowojski v. Poland, no. 26756/95, Commission decision of 29 November 1995). - EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 4493/04
He referred to the Winterwerp v. the Netherlands (judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, § 60) where the Court emphasised the following:. - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63
Neumeister ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2006 - 4493/04
They referred to the case Neumeister v. Austria (judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, § 24), where the Court had held that "full written proceedings or an oral hearing of the parties in the examination of such remedies would be a source of delay which it is important to avoid in this field".