Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EL MORABIT v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 8, Art. 13 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EuG, 02.09.2009 - T-37/07

  und Sicherheitspolitik - DAS GERICHT BESTÄTIGT DIE BESCHLÜSSE DES RATES, MIT …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07

  The applicant brought actions in the Court of First Instance (now re-named the General Court; the first-instance body of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, as it was named at the time) for annulment of Council Decisions 2006/1008/EC and 2007/445/EC in so far as they included his name (Cases T-37/07 and T-323/07 respectively).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07

  The Court will confine itself to noting that, according to its standing case-law, Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law to be available in respect only of such grievances as are "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; more recently, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 58, ECHR 2000-IV; Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 137, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Taheri Kandomabadi v. the Netherlands (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95

  ATHANASSOGLOU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07

  The Court will confine itself to noting that, according to its standing case-law, Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law to be available in respect only of such grievances as are "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; more recently, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 58, ECHR 2000-IV; Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 137, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Taheri Kandomabadi v. the Netherlands (dec.), nos.

 
• EGMR, 29.06.2004 - 6276/03

  TAHERI KANDOMABADI v. the NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07

  6276/03 and 6122/04, 29 June 2004).
• EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 31519/96

  KWAKYE-NTI ET DUFIE contre les PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07

  The Court reiterates that while the exclusion of a person from a country where his or her immediate family resides may in some circumstances raise an issue under Article 8, relationships between adult relatives do not necessarily attract the protection of that provision without further elements of dependency involving more than the normal emotional ties (see, among many other authorities, Kwakie-Ntie and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000; Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; and Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV).
• EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 39051/03

  EMONET ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07

  The Court reiterates that while the exclusion of a person from a country where his or her immediate family resides may in some circumstances raise an issue under Article 8, relationships between adult relatives do not necessarily attract the protection of that provision without further elements of dependency involving more than the normal emotional ties (see, among many other authorities, Kwakie-Ntie and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000; Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; and Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV).
• EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 27034/05

  Z. et T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07

  The Court reiterates that while the exclusion of a person from a country where his or her immediate family resides may in some circumstances raise an issue under Article 8, relationships between adult relatives do not necessarily attract the protection of that provision without further elements of dependency involving more than the normal emotional ties (see, among many other authorities, Kwakie-Ntie and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000; Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; and Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV).

• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 30474/14

  ALI AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND AND ITALY

  6276/03 and 6122/04, 29 June 2004; and El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010).
• EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 16870/11

  KAHADAWA ARACHCHIGE AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  The Court will confine itself to noting that, in accordance with its established case-law, Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law to be available only in respect of such grievances as are "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; more recently, F.A.K. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 30112/09, § 91, 23 October 2012; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 137, ECHR 2003-VIII; and Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 58, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08

  SAPONDZHYAN v. RUSSIA

  On a number of occasions the Court has stated that relationships between parents and adult children do not fall within the protective scope of Article 8 unless "additional factors of dependence, other than normal emotional ties, are shown to exist" (see, among many other authorities, Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; and F.N v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 3202/09, 17 September 2013).

 
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 30112/09

  F.A.K. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  6276/03 and 6122/04, 29 June 2004; and El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010).
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 60538/13

  A. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  6276/03 and 6122/04, 29 June 2004; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; and F.A.K. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 30112/09, § 91, 23 October 2012).
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 42331/05

  A.A.Q. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  As regards the applicant's family life with his children, who are all adult, the Court reiterates that relationships between adult relatives do not necessarily attract the protection of Article 8 without further elements of dependency involving more than the normal emotional ties (see, among many other authorities, Kwakie-Ntie and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000; Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV; and El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010).