Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VDOVINA v. RUSSIA

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 13458/07

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 36045/02

  SHNEYDERMAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 13458/07

  In particular, the Government did not explain how an application to the Tula Regional Judicial Board and an appeal against the Board's decision to the Tula Regional Court could have expedited the civil proceedings to which the applicant was a party or what relief - either preventive or compensatory - the applicant could have obtained by having recourse to those domestic authorities (see, to the same effect, Sidorenko v. Russia, no. 4459/03, § 39, 8 March 2007, and Shneyderman v. Russia, no. 36045/02, § 33, 11 January 2007).
• EGMR, 08.03.2007 - 4459/03

  SIDORENKO v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 13458/07

  In particular, the Government did not explain how an application to the Tula Regional Judicial Board and an appeal against the Board's decision to the Tula Regional Court could have expedited the civil proceedings to which the applicant was a party or what relief - either preventive or compensatory - the applicant could have obtained by having recourse to those domestic authorities (see, to the same effect, Sidorenko v. Russia, no. 4459/03, § 39, 8 March 2007, and Shneyderman v. Russia, no. 36045/02, § 33, 11 January 2007).
• EGMR, 07.06.2017 - 53084/99

  KORMACHEVA ET 105 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 13458/07

  It notes that the Government have failed to submit evidence as to the existence of any remedy that could have expedited the determination of the applicant's case or provided her with adequate redress for the delays that had already occurred (see Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, § 64, 29 January 2004).

• EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 43233/02

  MAKSIMOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has already held on a number of occasions that the notion of an effective remedy under Article 13 requires that the remedy should be capable of resulting in an award of fair and reasonable damages proportionate to the loss suffered (see Vdovina v. Russia, no. 13458/07, § 29, 18 June 2009; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2), no. 21071/05, § 49, 10 April 2008; and, mutatis mutandis, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 93, ECHR 2006-V, with further references).