Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 7307/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,68397
EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 7307/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,68397)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18.06.2009 - 7307/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,68397)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18. Juni 2009 - 7307/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,68397)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68397) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

    PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 7307/05
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 7307/05
    The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 66561/01

    MERIT v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 7307/05
    It has frequently found violations of Article 13 of the Convention because the current Ukrainian legislation does not provide a remedy for complaints concerning the length of proceedings (see Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, §§ 78-79, 30 March 2004 and subsequent case-law).
  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 7307/05
    The Court, having regard to the text of the decision to initiate criminal proceedings and the subsequent investigative measures taken with regard to the applicant (see paragraphs 5-7 above), takes the view that the applicant was "charged" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on 31 May 2002 (see, mutatis mutandis, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 46, Series A no. 35).
  • EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 8235/22

    SYUR AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 11. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 55250/16

    BUYLUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 47711/22

    SLYVYNSKYY AND CHUBAR v. UKRAINE

    APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 11. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 3779/14

    BILOKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 12. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 16677/16

    P.S. AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 12. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 12345/16

    SYROTENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 5159/21

    ROMANOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 33034/20

    SHVACHKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 39814/20

    SAVINOCHKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 52350/15

    DOROKHOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht