Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BALAKCHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BALAKCHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (17) Neu Zitiert selbst (25)
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 65196/01
RÍMSKOKATOLICKÁ FARNOST OBRÍSTVÍ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007). - EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Charzynski, cited above, §§ 35 and 40; Grzincic, cited above, §§ 99-106; Vokurka, cited above, § 49; Fakhretdinov and Others, cited above, §§ 30-31; Taron, cited above, §§ 36 and 42-44; and Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 49-56, 26 March 2013).
- EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01
NOGOLICA c. CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
In particular, the Court has previously departed from this rule in cases against Italy, Croatia, Slovakia, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia and Turkey concerning newly introduced remedies in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Giacometti and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 62155/00
PROVIDE S.R.L. c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
Under that case-law, legal persons, including commercial companies, are in principle entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damage flowing from the unreasonable length of proceedings (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2000-IV; Rímskokatolická Farnost Obríství v. the Czech Republic, no. 65196/01, § 38, 24 May 2005; and Provide S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 62155/00, §§ 10, 24 and 46, 5 July 2007). - EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4860/09
TURGUT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; Charzynski, cited above, §§ 35 and 40; Grzincic, cited above, §§ 99-106; Vokurka, cited above, § 49; Fakhretdinov and Others, cited above, §§ 30-31; Taron, cited above, §§ 36 and 42-44; and Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 49-56, 26 March 2013). - EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
In particular, the Court has previously departed from this rule in cases against Italy, Croatia, Slovakia, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia and Turkey concerning newly introduced remedies in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Giacometti and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
These amounts can hardly be regarded as excessive (see, mutatis mutandis, Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, § 38, ECHR 2005-V, and Uzun, cited above, § 58). - EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
- EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10
However, since the powers and procedural guarantees an authority possesses are relevant in determining whether the remedy before it is effective (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 67, Series A no. 28; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 113 (b), Series A no. 61; Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 77 (b), Series A no. 116; and, more recently, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 197, ECHR 2012), it should be observed that the Inspectorate enjoys considerable independence (see paragraphs 18 and 19 above). - EGMR - 19993/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02
- EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81
LEANDER c. SUÈDE
- EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 22689/07
DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 10755/13
UZUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 26716/09
FAKHRETDINOV and OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 10200/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 53126/07
TARON v. GERMANY
- EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02
GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE
- EGMR - 21819/04
[ENG]
- EGMR - 13466/03
[ENG]
- EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
- EGMR - 14163/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 24342/04
ZUNIC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA
These sums can hardly be seen as excessive for any but the most indigent litigants (see Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, § 63, 18 June 2013). - EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 29263/12
S.Z. c. BULGARIE
Le texte des dispositions susmentionnées et les motifs de la réforme ont été reproduits dans la décision de la Cour (Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, §§ 20-34, 18 juin 2013).La Cour a déjà reconnu que ces recours pouvaient en principe apporter un redressement approprié en cas de violation de l'exigence de délai raisonnable et devaient être épuisés par les requérants potentiels préalablement à la saisine de la Cour (Balakchiev c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, 18 juin 2013, Valcheva and Abrashev c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 6194/11 et 34887/11, 18 juin 2013).
- EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 73798/13
VALADA MATOS DAS NEVES c. PORTUGAL
Cette subsidiarité s'exprime dans les articles 13 et 35 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi d'autres, Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, § 49, 18 juin 2013).
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 75717/14
BRUDAN c. ROUMANIE
Cette subsidiarité s'exprime dans les articles 13 et 35 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi d'autres, Cocchiarella c. Italie ([GC], no 64886/01, § 38, CEDH 2006-V), et Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, § 49, 18 juin 2013). - EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 29026/06
BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
27451/09 and 60650/09, 23 September 2010 concerning the non-enforcement of judgments; Stella and 10 Other applications v. Italy (dec.), no. 49169/09, 16 September 2014, and Latak v. Poland (dec.), no. 52070/08, 12 October 2010 concerning prison overcrowding; Techniki Olympiaki A.E. v. Greece (dec.), no. 40547/10, 1 October 2013; Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, 18 June 2013, and Müdür Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013 concerning the length of proceedings; and Hodzic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 3461/08, 4 April 2017 concerning "old" foreign-currency savings). - EGMR, 25.02.2016 - 17708/12
OLIVIERI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Cette subsidiarité s'exprime dans les articles 13 et 35 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi d'autres, Cocchiarella précité, § 38 ; Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, § 49, 18 juin 2013). - EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 40547/10
TECHNIKI OLYMPIAKI A.E. c. GRÈCE
This subsidiary character is articulated in Article 13 and Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, § 49, 18 June 2013). - EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 69591/14
KOLEV c. BULGARIE
Le texte des dispositions susmentionnées et les motifs de la réforme figurent dans la décision de la Cour Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (no 65187/10, §§ 20-34, 18 juin 2013). - EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37124/10
TONI KOSTADINOV c. BULGARIE
La Cour s'est écartée de cette règle générale dans des affaires concernant des recours formés pour durée excessive d'une procédure (Brusco c. Italie (déc.), no 69789/01, CEDH 2001-IX; Nogolica c. Croatie (déc.), no 77784/01, CEDH 2002-VIII; Andrásik et autres c. Slovaquie (déc.), nos 57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 et 60226/00, CEDH 2002-IX ; Balakchiev et autres c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 65187/10, § 83, 18 juin 2013), dans des affaires concernant les conditions de détention inadéquates (Latak, précité, §§ 80-82 ; Lominski c. Pologne (déc.), no 33502/09, §§ 71-73, 12 octobre 2010 ; Stella et autres c. Italie (déc.), no 49169/09, §§ 42-45, 16 septembre 2014), ou encore dans des affaires concernant le droit au respect des biens (Demopoulos et autres c. Turquie (déc.) [GC], nos 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 et 21819/04, §§ 87 et 88, 1 mars 2010). - EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 44229/11
PENDOV v. BULGARIA
46113/99 and 7 others, § 87-88, ECHR 2010, and Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), § 83, no. 65187/10, 18 June 2013), it sees no justification for doing so in the case at hand. - EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 31386/09
SÀRL LE CLUB ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 28.01.2016 - 79828/12
KIRIL ANDREEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10
KIISA v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 72999/10
KIISA v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 21.12.2021 - 10108/16
SHIYANKOVA-KASAPSKA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 34783/06
IZET HAXHIA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 44448/07
AGONTSEV v. BULGARIA