Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.06.2020 - 75792/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,15141) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHEBALDINA v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SHEBALDINA v. UKRAINE
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05
KOROLEV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2020 - 75792/11
The Court's assessment Admissibility 14. As to the Government's objection that the applicant had not suffered a significant disadvantage, given that the amount that she could have claimed had amounted to UAH 2, 244.30 (the equivalent of EUR 204), the Court notes that the question of whether the applicant had suffered a "significant disadvantage" can be determined with reference to criteria such as the financial impact of the matter in dispute or the importance of the case for the applicant (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2020 - 75792/11
Having regard to its findings relating to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see paragraphs 18-24 above), the Court considers that it has examined the main legal question raised in the present application and that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, there has also been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).