Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TAZIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Taziyeva and Others v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 23445/03

  ESMUKHAMBETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 50757/06

  These are issues to be examined rather under Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see also Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, § 188, 29 March 2011, where even total destruction of homes and property had not been found to be in violation of Article 3 of the Convention).

  Reference to this Act cannot replace specific authorisation of an interference with an individual's rights under Article 8 of the Convention, delimiting the object and scope of that interference and drawn up in accordance with the relevant legal provisions (see, for example, Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, § 176, 29 March 2011; and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, §§ 188-189, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 50757/06

  The Court reiterates that the reference to "victim" in Article 34 means a person directly affected by the act or omission complained of, that is to say, a person who has a personal, direct and valid interest in seeing the act proscribed or the omission repaired (see Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 27, Series A no. 31, and Gayuduk and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 45526/99, 2 July 2002).

  The Court reiterates that the reference to "victim" in Article 34 means a person directly affected by the act or omission complained of, that is to say, a person who has a personal, direct and valid interest in seeing the act proscribed or the omission repaired (see Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 27, Series A no. 31, and Gayuduk and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 45526/99, 2 July 2002).

• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 50757/06

  Reference to this Act cannot replace specific authorisation of an interference with an individual's rights under Article 8 of the Convention, delimiting the object and scope of that interference and drawn up in accordance with the relevant legal provisions (see, for example, Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, § 176, 29 March 2011; and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, §§ 188-189, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 50757/06

  In certain cases, especially in the context of secret measures by public authorities, this implies that the law itself must provide protection against arbitrary interference with an individual's right under Article 8 (see Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 76, 10 March 2009; see also Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, § 67; Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000-II; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 28341/95

  ROTARU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 50757/06

  In certain cases, especially in the context of secret measures by public authorities, this implies that the law itself must provide protection against arbitrary interference with an individual's right under Article 8 (see Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 76, 10 March 2009; see also Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, § 67; Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000-II; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

  MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 50757/06

  In certain cases, especially in the context of secret measures by public authorities, this implies that the law itself must provide protection against arbitrary interference with an individual's right under Article 8 (see Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 76, 10 March 2009; see also Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, § 67; Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000-II; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 27798/95

  AMANN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 50757/06

  In certain cases, especially in the context of secret measures by public authorities, this implies that the law itself must provide protection against arbitrary interference with an individual's right under Article 8 (see Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 76, 10 March 2009; see also Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, § 67; Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000-II; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000-V).