Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  R.V. AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  R.V. AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 64297/12

  D'ALCONZO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  Effective respect for family life requires that future relations between a parent and child be determined solely in the light of all relevant considerations, and not by the mere passage of time (see Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 102, ECHR 2000-I; D"Alconzo v. Italy, no. 64297/12, § 64, 23 February 2017; and Barnea and Caldararu v. Italy, no. 37931/15, § 86, 22 June 2017).

  The Court is mindful that decisions issued by the Youth Court within the applicable legal framework do not become final in the sense that they may be modified or revoked at any time on the grounds of changes in the underlying circumstances (see, in the context of contact rights, D"Alconzo v. Italy, no. 64297/12, § 47, 23 February 2017).

• EGMR, 09.05.2003 - 52763/99

  COVEZZI ET MORSELLI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  In particular, the Court reiterates that the placement of a child in care should normally be regarded as a temporary measure to be discontinued as soon as circumstances permit, and any measures of implementation of temporary care should be consistent with the ultimate aim of reuniting the natural parent and child (see Covezzi and Morselli v. Italy, no. 52763/99, § 118, 9 May 2003, and R.M.S. v. Spain, no. 28775/12, § 89, 18 June 2013).
• EGMR, 22.06.2017 - 37931/15

  BARNEA ET CALDARARU c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  Effective respect for family life requires that future relations between a parent and child be determined solely in the light of all relevant considerations, and not by the mere passage of time (see Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 102, ECHR 2000-I; D"Alconzo v. Italy, no. 64297/12, § 64, 23 February 2017; and Barnea and Caldararu v. Italy, no. 37931/15, § 86, 22 June 2017).

 
• EGMR, 23.03.2017 - 71660/14

  ENDRIZZI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  If they are not, there will be a failure to respect their family life, and the interference resulting from the decision will not be capable of being regarded as "necessary" within the meaning of Article 8. In this connection, the Court has further clarified that in cases concerning a parent's relationship with his or her child, there is a duty to act swiftly and exercise exceptional diligence, in view of the risk that the passage of time may result in a de facto determination of the matter (see, mutatis mutandis, Kautzor v. Germany, no. 23338/09, § 81, 22 March 2012 and, in the context of contact rights, Endrizzi v. Italy, no. 71660/14, § 48, 23 March 2017, and Improta v. Italy, no. 66396/14, § 45, 4 May 2017).
• EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 66396/14

  IMPROTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  If they are not, there will be a failure to respect their family life, and the interference resulting from the decision will not be capable of being regarded as "necessary" within the meaning of Article 8. In this connection, the Court has further clarified that in cases concerning a parent's relationship with his or her child, there is a duty to act swiftly and exercise exceptional diligence, in view of the risk that the passage of time may result in a de facto determination of the matter (see, mutatis mutandis, Kautzor v. Germany, no. 23338/09, § 81, 22 March 2012 and, in the context of contact rights, Endrizzi v. Italy, no. 71660/14, § 48, 23 March 2017, and Improta v. Italy, no. 66396/14, § 45, 4 May 2017).
• EGMR, 28.04.2016 - 68884/13

  CINCIMINO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  The Court further reiterates that, whilst Article 8 contains no explicit procedural requirements, the decision-making process involved in measures of interference must be fair and such as to ensure due respect for the interests safeguarded by Article 8 (see W. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1987, Series A no. 121, p. 29, § 64, and Cincimino v. Italy, no. 68884/13, § 64, 28 April 2016).
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95

  T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  Relying on the case of T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 28945/95, ECHR 2001-V (extracts)), the Government argued that the impugned measures had been necessary within the meaning of the Court's case-law.
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 28775/12

  R.M.S. c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  In particular, the Court reiterates that the placement of a child in care should normally be regarded as a temporary measure to be discontinued as soon as circumstances permit, and any measures of implementation of temporary care should be consistent with the ultimate aim of reuniting the natural parent and child (see Covezzi and Morselli v. Italy, no. 52763/99, § 118, 9 May 2003, and R.M.S. v. Spain, no. 28775/12, § 89, 18 June 2013).
• EGMR, 22.03.2012 - 23338/09

  Vaterschaftsprozess: Welchen Papa braucht das Kind?

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  If they are not, there will be a failure to respect their family life, and the interference resulting from the decision will not be capable of being regarded as "necessary" within the meaning of Article 8. In this connection, the Court has further clarified that in cases concerning a parent's relationship with his or her child, there is a duty to act swiftly and exercise exceptional diligence, in view of the risk that the passage of time may result in a de facto determination of the matter (see, mutatis mutandis, Kautzor v. Germany, no. 23338/09, § 81, 22 March 2012 and, in the context of contact rights, Endrizzi v. Italy, no. 71660/14, § 48, 23 March 2017, and Improta v. Italy, no. 66396/14, § 45, 4 May 2017).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 37748/13

  Citing the Court's judgment in Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy ([GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000-VIII), they contended that, considering what the children had suffered as a result of the particular circumstances of the case, all decisions had been taken in their best interests to prevent harm to their health and growth, which had ultimately led to solutions not coinciding with the mother's interests.
• EGMR, 14.01.2003 - 27751/95

  K.A. v. FINLAND

• EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 25426/20

  I.M. ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Le régime juridique interne 64. Certaines dispositions du droit interne pertinent en l'espèce sont exposées dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, §§ 65-69, 18 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 24.06.2021 - 40910/19

  A.T. c. ITALIE

  Le droit interne pertinent en l'espèce est décrit dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, §§ 65-69, 18 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 17791/22

  A ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  LE RÉGIME JURIDIQUE INTERNE L'autorité parentale, la garde des enfants et le droit de visite 51. Le droit interne pertinent en matière de procédures de contrôle de l'autorité parentale est décrit dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, §§ 65-69, 18 juillet 2019).

 
• EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 48618/22

  A.S. ET M.S. c. ITALIE

  Le droit interne en matière de procédures de contrôle de l'autorité parentale est exposé dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, §§ 65-69, 18 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 41382/19

  R.B. ET M. c. ITALIE

  Le droit interne pertinent en l'espèce est décrit dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, §§ 65-69, 18 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 21052/18

  TERNA c. ITALIE

  Le droit interne pertinent en l'espèce est décrit dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, §§ 65-69 18 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 36046/20

  ADONY ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  La Cour note que la jurisprudence de la Cour en matière d'interruption des contacts (voir, par exemple, Piazzi c. Italie, no 36168/09, 2 novembre 2010, Lombardo c. Italie, no 25704/11, 29 janvier 2013, Nicolò Santilli c. Italie, no 51930/10, 17 décembre 2013, Manuello et Nevi c. Italie, no 107/10, 20 janvier 2015, Bondavalli c. Italie, no 35532/12, 17 novembre 2015, Cincimino c. Italie, no 68884/13, 28 avril 2016, Giorgioni c. Italie, no 43299/12, 15 septembre 2016, Strumia c. Italie, no 53377/13, 23 juin 2016, Solarino c. Italie, no 76171/13, 9 février 2017, D'Alconzo c. Italie, no 64297/12, 23 février 2017, Endrizzi c. Italie, no 71660/14, 23 mars 2017, 1mprota c. Italie, no 66396/14, 4 mai 2017, R.B. et M. c. Italie, no 41382/19, 22 avril 2021, A.T. c. Italie, no 40910/19, 24 juin 2021, et T.M. c. Italie [comité], no 29786/19, 7 octobre 2021), ainsi que celle concernant le placement à l'assistance publique (voir, par exemple, Scozzari et Giunta c. Italie [GC], nos 39221/98 et 41963/98, CEDH 2000 VIII, Covezzi et Morselli c. Italie, no 52763/99, 9 mai 2003, Roda et Bonfatti c. Italie, no 10427/02, 21 novembre 2006, Clemeno et autres c. Italie, no 19537/03, 21 octobre 2008, R.V. et autres c. Italie, no 37748/13, 18 juillet 2019, et A.I. c. Italie, no 70896/17, 1er avril 2021) est claire et abondante.
• EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 82314/17

  E.C. c. ITALIE

  Le droit interne pertinent se trouve décrit dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, § 65-69, 18 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 18549/20

  FIAGBE c. ITALIE

  Les principes généraux applicables sont bien établis dans la jurisprudence de la Cour et ont été récemment largement exposés dans les arrêts A.I. c. Italie, (no 70896/17, 1er avril 2021), Strand Lobben et autres c. Norvège ([GC], no 37283/13, 10 septembre 2019), et R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, 18 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 30589/18

  SANTONICOLA ET PALUMBO c. ITALIE

  Le droit interne pertinent 27. Le droit interne pertinent en l'espèce est décrit dans l'arrêt R.V. et autres c. Italie (no 37748/13, §§ 65-69 18 juillet 2019).