Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 37658/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,63614) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHERSTYUK v. UKRAINE
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 45223/99
RUDZINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 37658/03
45526/99 and foll., ECHR 2002-VI (extracts); Rudzinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 45223/99, ECHR 1999-VI). - EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 45526/99
GAYDUK ET AUTRES c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 37658/03
45526/99 and foll., ECHR 2002-VI (extracts); Rudzinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 45223/99, ECHR 1999-VI). - EKMR, 09.05.1986 - 11628/85
LINDE v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 37658/03
However, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not guarantee any right to acquire the ownership of property (Linde v. Sweden, application no. 11628/85, Commission decision of 9 May 1986, DR 47, p. 270).
- EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 37658/03
The Court reiterates that, according to the established case-law of the Convention organs, "possessions" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 can be "existing possessions" (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48) or assets, including claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd. and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51; and Pressos Companía Naviera S.A. v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, § 31). - EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 37658/03
The Court reiterates that, according to the established case-law of the Convention organs, "possessions" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 can be "existing possessions" (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48) or assets, including claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd. and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51; and Pressos Companía Naviera S.A. v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, § 31). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 37658/03
The Court reiterates that, according to the established case-law of the Convention organs, "possessions" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 can be "existing possessions" (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48) or assets, including claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd. and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51; and Pressos Companía Naviera S.A. v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, § 31).