Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ATALAY v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 1249/03

  The failures highlighted above undermined the deterrent effect of the judicial system in place and the significance of the role it was required to play in preventing violations of the prohibition of ill-treatment (see Okkalı v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 66, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 1249/03

  The Government referred to the judgments in the cases of Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC] (no. 36022/97, § 97, ECHR 2003-VIII) and Handyside v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48), and maintained that the national authorities were better placed than an international court to evaluate local needs and conditions.
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 1249/03

  Furthermore, referring to the judgment in the case of Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 24, § 57), the Government submitted that "it [was] no part of the Court's function to substitute for the assessment of the national authorities any other assessment of what might be the best policy in this field".

• EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 61679/10

  KOSOWICZ c. POLOGNE

  Pour parvenir à sa conclusion à cet égard, le tribunal régional s'appuya sur les dispositions pertinentes en l'espèce de la loi sur les sociétés publiques et sur celles du code civil, et il invoqua en outre l'arrêt I Aca 1249/03 de la cour d'appel de Varsovie en date du 17 mars 2004 (paragraphe 12 ci-dessous).

  Dans son arrêt I Aca 1249/03 du 17 mars 2004, 1a cour d'appel de Varsovie a jugé que l'obligation de réparer le tort occasionné à l'administrateur d'une société publique par l'application irrégulière du contrat portant attribution de son mandat d'administrateur incombait à la société publique en question.

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 12294/07

  ZONTUL c. GRECE

  S'agissant du caractère adéquat et dissuasif de la sanction prononcée, la Cour rappelle, comme elle l'a déjà fait dans l'arrêt Atalay c. Turquie (no 1249/03, § 40, 18 septembre 2008) qu'elle ne peut contrôler que la responsabilité de l'Etat au regard de la Convention.
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 55164/08

  A. v. CROATIA

  The Court must grant substantial deference to the national courts in the choice of appropriate measures, while also maintaining a certain power of review and the power to intervene in cases of manifest disproportion between the gravity of the act and the results obtained at domestic level (see, mutatis mutandis, Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 62, 20 December 2007; Atalay v. Turkey, no. 1249/03, § 40, 18 September 2008; and Beganovic v. Croatia, no. 46423/06, § 78, ECHR 2009-...).

 
• EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 3933/04

  KOPYLOV v. RUSSIA

  Were it to be otherwise, the States' duty to carry out an effective investigation would lose much of its meaning, and the right enshrined by Article 3, despite its fundamental importance, would be ineffective in practice (see Gäfgen, cited above, § 123; Atalay v. Turkey, no. 1249/03, § 40, 18 September 2008; and, mutatis mutandis, Nikolova and Velichkova, cited above, § 62).
• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 18280/04

  SHISHKIN v. RUSSIA

  Were it to be otherwise, the States" duty to carry out an effective investigation would lose much of its meaning, and the right enshrined by Article 3, despite its fundamental importance, would be ineffective in practice (see Gäfgen, cited above, § 123; Atalay v. Turkey, no. 1249/03, § 40, 18 September 2008; and, mutatis mutandis, Nikolova and Velichkova, cited above, § 62).
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 9183/09

  BAROVOV v. RUSSIA

  While the Court should grant substantial deference to the national courts in the choice of appropriate sanctions for ill-treatment and homicide by State agents, it must exercise a certain power of review and intervene in cases of manifest disproportion between the gravity of the act and the punishment imposed (see Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 62, 20 December 2007, and Atalay v. Turkey, no. 1249/03, § 40, 18 September 2008).