Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MULLER v. AUSTRIA (No. 2)

  (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 27618/95

  PESTI AND FRODL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 28034/04

  27618/95 and 27619/95, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 07.10.1988 - 10519/83

  SALABIAKU c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 28034/04

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 2 does not prohibit the use of presumptions of fact or law, if they remain within reasonable limits which take into account the importance of what is at stake and maintain the rights of the defence (see Salabiaku v. France, judgment of 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 28).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 28034/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 12555/03

  MULLER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 28034/04

  In the present case, there is no indication that the scope of review of the Administrative Court was insufficient for the purposes of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 (see Müller v. Austria (no. 1), no. 12555/03, § 25, 5 October 2006).

• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 23486/12

  DORADO BAÚLDE v. SPAIN

  In this regard, the Contracting States may limit the scope of the review by a higher tribunal by virtue of the reference in paragraph 1 of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to national law (see Müller v. Austria (no. 2), no. 28034/04, § 37, 18 September 2008).