Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DOCHNAL v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Dochnal v. Poland

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 5829/04

  Russland wegen Chodorkowski verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 31622/07

  However, such cases remain rare (see, as an opposite example, Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia [GC], no. 60654/00, § 129, ECHR 2007-II, and Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, § 261, 31 May 2011).
• EGMR, 19.05.2004 - 70276/01

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (hinreichender Verdacht nach Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 31622/07

  Thus, in Gusinskiy v. Russia (no. 70276/01, § 73-78, ECHR 2004-... (extracts), the Court accepted that the applicant's liberty had been restricted, inter alia, for a purpose other than those mentioned in Article 5. The Court in that case based its findings on an agreement signed between the detainee and a federal minister of the press.
• EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10444/83

  LAMY c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 31622/07

  The Court reiterates that a certain degree of access to the case file, if only to such an extent as to afford the detainee an opportunity of effectively challenging evidence on which his detention was based, may in certain circumstances be envisaged in proceedings concerning review of the lawfulness of detention during judicial proceedings (see Lamy v. Belgium, judgment of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151, pp. 16--17, § 29, and Chruscinski v. Poland, no. 22755/04, § 62, 6 November 2007).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 31622/07

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V, and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII, and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.

• EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 52641/16

  K.P. v. POLAND

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including cases brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints of a violation of Article 8 of the Convention in respect of refusals to allow family visits to people in detention (see Piechowicz v. Poland, no. 20071/07, § 222, 17 April 2012; Horych v. Poland, no. 13621/08, § 132, 17 April 2012; and Dochnal v. Poland, no. 31622/07, § 97, 18 September 2012).