Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 54781/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,56114) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
V. O. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 8, Art. 8+13, Art. 13, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2+13 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 54781/07
Although it is clear that the applicant did not directly raise his Convention complaints in the domestic proceedings, the Court recalls that it was not necessary for him to do so as long as the issue was raised implicitly, or in substance (Castells v. Spain, no. 11798/85, judgment of 23 April 1992, § 32; Ahmet Sadik v. Greece, no. 18877/91, judgment of 15 November 1996, § 33; Fressoz and Roire v. France, no. 29183/95, judgment of 21 January 1999, § 38; Azinas v. Cyprus, [GC] no. 56679/00, ECHR 2004 -, §§ 40-41). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 54781/07
Although it is clear that the applicant did not directly raise his Convention complaints in the domestic proceedings, the Court recalls that it was not necessary for him to do so as long as the issue was raised implicitly, or in substance (Castells v. Spain, no. 11798/85, judgment of 23 April 1992, § 32; Ahmet Sadik v. Greece, no. 18877/91, judgment of 15 November 1996, § 33; Fressoz and Roire v. France, no. 29183/95, judgment of 21 January 1999, § 38; Azinas v. Cyprus, [GC] no. 56679/00, ECHR 2004 -, §§ 40-41). - EGMR, 15.11.1996 - 18877/91
AHMET SADIK c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 54781/07
Although it is clear that the applicant did not directly raise his Convention complaints in the domestic proceedings, the Court recalls that it was not necessary for him to do so as long as the issue was raised implicitly, or in substance (Castells v. Spain, no. 11798/85, judgment of 23 April 1992, § 32; Ahmet Sadik v. Greece, no. 18877/91, judgment of 15 November 1996, § 33; Fressoz and Roire v. France, no. 29183/95, judgment of 21 January 1999, § 38; Azinas v. Cyprus, [GC] no. 56679/00, ECHR 2004 -, §§ 40-41). - EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 25091/94
SAHiN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 54781/07
It normally requires also that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among other authorities, Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Elçi and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, §§ 604 and 605, 13 November 2003). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 54781/07
It normally requires also that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among other authorities, Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Elçi and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, §§ 604 and 605, 13 November 2003).