Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SINGARTIYSKI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Art. 11 MRK
  Violation of Art. 11 (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 44079/98

  THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  The relevant provisions of the 1991 Constitution and the 1990 Meetings and Marches Act are set out in paragraphs 48-51 of the Court's judgment in the case of Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria (nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX), in paragraphs 72-76 of the Court's judgment in the case of United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005) and in paragraphs 24-28 of the Court's judgment in the case of Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria (cited above).

  The Committee of Ministers concluded the examination of application no. 44079/98 (United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria) and application no. 46336/99 (Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria) on 8 June 2011, by adopting Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)46, which reads, in so far as relevant:.

• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  The relevant provisions of the 1991 Constitution and the 1990 Meetings and Marches Act are set out in paragraphs 48-51 of the Court's judgment in the case of Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria (nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX), in paragraphs 72-76 of the Court's judgment in the case of United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005) and in paragraphs 24-28 of the Court's judgment in the case of Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria (cited above).

  Given that the Regional Governor's decision was made just four days before the planned rally (on a Wednesday, when the rally was to take place the following Sunday) and was not served on the applicants (see paragraph 11 above), it is unrealistic to assume that it would have been reviewed in time for the rally - whose timing was crucial for the organisers - to proceed (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, Commission decision of 29 June 1998, unreported).

• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 6991/08

  HYDE PARK AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA (Nos. 5 and 6)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  6991/08 and 15084/08, § 34 in fine, 14 September 2010).

 
• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 77568/01

  PETKOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  Were that to be the case, that right, which, along with the rights to freedom of expression and association, and the right to take part in free and fair elections, is one of the essential features of a vigorous and healthy democracy, would be ineffective in practice (see, mutatis mutandis, Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 77568/01, 178/02 and 505/02, § 79, ECHR 2009-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 33268/03

  ASHUGHYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  So do measures taken by the authorities during a rally, such as a dispersal of the rally or arrests of participants (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 7 and 30, ECHR 2006-XIII, and Hyde Park and Others, cited above, §§ 9, 13, 16, 41, 44 and 48), and penalties imposed for having taken part in a rally (see Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 100-02, 15 November 2007; Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, §§ 75-77, 17 July 2008; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

  SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  So do measures taken by the authorities during a rally, such as a dispersal of the rally or arrests of participants (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 7 and 30, ECHR 2006-XIII, and Hyde Park and Others, cited above, §§ 9, 13, 16, 41, 44 and 48), and penalties imposed for having taken part in a rally (see Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 100-02, 15 November 2007; Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, §§ 75-77, 17 July 2008; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  A refusal to allow an individual to travel for the purpose of attending a meeting amounts to an interference as well (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 59-62, ECHR 2003-III).
• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 178/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  Were that to be the case, that right, which, along with the rights to freedom of expression and association, and the right to take part in free and fair elections, is one of the essential features of a vigorous and healthy democracy, would be ineffective in practice (see, mutatis mutandis, Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 77568/01, 178/02 and 505/02, § 79, ECHR 2009-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02

  Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07

  The fact that the Regional Governor should rely on grounds which the Court had, at the time when the Governor made his decision, already found deficient is indicative of a troubling disregard for the Court's judgments and the applicants" right to freedom of peaceful assembly (see, mutatis mutandis, Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §§ 83-88, ECHR 2009-..., and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov, cited above, § 116).

• EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07

  KIRIL IVANOV v. BULGARIA

  29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59489/00, 20 October 2005; Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 46336/99, 24 November 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59491/00, 19 January 2006; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 37586/04, 18 October 2011; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, 18 October 2011; Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, 18 October 2011; and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos.
• EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 29496/16

  THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (No. 3)

  29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59489/00, 20 October 2005; Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 46336/99, 24 November 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59491/00, 19 January 2006; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 37586/04, 18 October 2011; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, 18 October 2011; Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, 18 October 2011; and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos.
• EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 70502/13

  YORDAN IVANOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59489/00, 20 October 2005; Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 46336/99, 24 November 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59491/00, 19 January 2006; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 37586/04, 18 October 2011; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, 18 October 2011; Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, 18 October 2011; and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos.
• EGMR - 6820/21 (anhängig)

  PARASKOV v. BULGARIA and 3 other applications

  Has there been a breach of the applicants' right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005; Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 46336/99, 24 November 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 37586/04, 18 October 2011; Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, 18 October 2011; and Kiril Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 17599/07, 11 January 2018), or, in application no. 48647/21, also of the applicant's right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?.